Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

England issue Lawrence, Genge, Martin and Smith injury update

By PA
England's Ollie Lawrence (Photo by Julian Finney/World Rugby via Getty Images)

Ollie Lawrence could reinforce England in time for their Guinness Six Nations round-three clash with Scotland as he steps up his recovery from a hip problem.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lawrence sustained the injury while on European duty for Bath against Toulouse a fortnight before the championship began and it was initially feared he might miss the entire tournament.

However, the powerful centre could return to England’s Surrey base as early as this week, boosting Steve Borthwick’s options in the No12 jersey he would have worn against Italy last Saturday if he was fit and available for selection.

Video Spacer

Stuart Lancaster discusses Owen Farrell’s move to Racing 92

Video Spacer

Stuart Lancaster discusses Owen Farrell’s move to Racing 92

“Ollie is potentially coming in at the end of this week, maybe next week. He is not available against Wales this weekend,” explained attack coach Richard Wigglesworth on Tuesday.

England are optimistic that Ellis Genge will overcome his foot damage in time for the visit of Warren Gatland’s men to Twickenham this Saturday.

Fixture
Six Nations
England
16 - 14
Full-time
Wales
All Stats and Data

Genge withdrew from the bench on the morning of the 27-24 win in Rome, with Beno Obano taking his place among the replacements.

“Ellis took some part in training today [Tuesday] and we are hopeful that he is available for the weekend, but we have obviously got to get through the rest of the week,” Wigglesworth said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Second-rower George Martin is receiving treatment for his knee injury and could also be back for the trip to Murrayfield, but there is still no date set for Marcus Smith’s return from a calf problem.

Smith sustained the damage during training last week at England’s camp in Girona and he could miss the whole Six Nations.

“It looks like it will be further back in the tournament – if we get him back. It won’t be in the next couple of weeks,” Wigglesworth said.

“Marcus has an incredible attitude. He was gutted but we were gutted as well. We know he is an international quality player.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We are blessed in that position because we have got George Ford and Fin Smith, but that doesn’t distract from what a top player he is and the impact he potentially would have had.

“His attitude was, ‘I’ll just come back better’. I have no doubt that if we see him later in the tournament or if it’s after that then he will come back in and put his hand up like he did.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Singapore SVNS Day 1 - Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 12 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

28 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE 'Had Feyi-Waboso stayed with us, he’d be playing for Wales by now - he should be playing for Wales.' 'Had Feyi-Waboso stayed with us, he’d be playing for Wales by now - he should be playing for Wales.'
Search