Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

David Campese names his Springbok world player of the year winner

Pieter-Steph du Toit (left) and Eben Etzebeth are on the four-strong World Rugby men's player of the year award shortlist (Photo by Mike Hewitt/Getty Images)

Legendary Wallabies winger David Campese has predicted which of the three nominated Springboks will win the World Rugby men’s player of the year award this Sunday. South African trio Eben Etzebeth, Cheslin Kolbe and Pieter-Steph du Toit have been included on the four-strong shortlist completed by Ireland’s Caelan Doris.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s the second year in succession and the third time in his career that Etzebeth has been a nominee and Campese believe the lock will be named winner when the announcement is made this weekend in Monaco.

First introduced in 2001, when Ireland’s Keith Wood was the winner, there have been just three previous South African winners – Schalk Burger in 2007, Bryan Habana in 2007 and du Toit in 2019.

Video Spacer

Bok lock Jean Kleyn on SA’s World Rugby Player of the Year candidates and Eben Etzebeth

Jean Kleyn is relishing every moment in the Bok camp and learning from Eben Etzebeth again as he prepares for his first Test appearance since last year’s World Cup Final.

Video Spacer

Bok lock Jean Kleyn on SA’s World Rugby Player of the Year candidates and Eben Etzebeth

Jean Kleyn is relishing every moment in the Bok camp and learning from Eben Etzebeth again as he prepares for his first Test appearance since last year’s World Cup Final.

Speaking to Vision4Sport, who offer hospitality packages for rugby’s most iconic events, Campese said about the player of the year award shortlist: “That just shows how dominant South Africa are in the game.

“The player of the year has got to come from the best team. They are by far the best in the world. So good that they could put out five teams which could hold their own against anyone.

“To my mind it has to be Etzebeth. As a forward in the middle of the scrum to do what he does week in week out is phenomenal.”

Campese did have a word of praise for Etzebeth’s fellow nominee, Kolbe. “What a player, what a great player. He is just getting better. He is a great entertainer and the best thing about him is that he is not 120 kilograms! He provides such flair and excitement.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It means young kids can look at him and realise that they too could still play rugby. That’s what is most inspiring about him, the impact he has on the next generation.”

Next up for the Springboks are winless Wales, who suffered a record 11th successive Test loss last weekend. Campese suggested a hammering is in store while he also criticised the Welsh Rugby Union for their handling of the situation.

“It could be a horror show. The Springboks could easily put another 50 points on them and batter them. It is not going to be pretty,” he feared. “Warren Gatland made clear he was going to start again when he came in and wipe the slate clean. The WRU board should come out and say, ‘We support you’.

“They bought into his vision when he started again for a second time. He told them he would have to rebuild and everyone knows it takes time. But the WRU is sitting in silence. They can’t sit on the fence. They have to back him.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Who knows who would replace Gatland. That’s the same problem as Australia had. They haven’t got any coaches. There is no succession plan. Where are the new Welsh coaches? Is Sam Warburton the answer? Who knows.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

14 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

284 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT