Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Crisis averted for Springboks after Franco Mostert hearing

Franco Mostert (L) of South Africa has an altercation with Ross Vintcent of Italy during the Quilter Nations Series 2025 match between Italy and South Africa at Allianz Stadium on November 15, 2025 in Turin, Italy. (Photo by Timothy Rogers/Getty Images)

South Africa second-row Franco Mostert is free to play against Ireland on Saturday in the Quilter Nations Series after having his red card against Italy rescinded.

ADVERTISEMENT

The double World Cup winner was sent off by referee James Doleman after only 10 minutes of the Springboks’ 32-14 victory over the Azzurri in Turin for a high shot on Italy fly-half Paolo Garbisi.

Mostert appeared before an independent disciplinary committee on Tuesday, with South Africa facing the prospect of losing a second lock in as many weeks following Lood de Jager’s tour-ending ban for his red card against France the week before. This would have left South Africa’s second-row stocks fairly thin for the rest of their tour, though Rassie Erasmus would still have had plenty of options.

VIDEO

Instead, the 34-year-old has been cleared to play the Boks’ final two tour games against Ireland and Wales, with his red car expunged.

Though the panel determined that an act of foul play had occurred, they deemed the tackle unworthy of a red card, saying the initial contact was shoulder on shoulder.

Fixture
Internationals
Ireland
13 - 24
Full-time
South Africa
All Stats and Data

A statement reads: “South Africa number 5, Franco Mostert, appeared before an independent disciplinary committee on Tuesday evening via video link having received a red card for an act of foul play contrary to Law 9.13 in the match between Italy and South Africa on Saturday 15th November 2025.

“The independent disciplinary committee was chaired by Stephen Hardy (Australia), who was joined by former players Ofisa Tonu’u (New Zealand) and Jamie Corsi (Wales).

ADVERTISEMENT

“Having conducted a detailed review of all available evidence, including all camera angles and additional evidence and submissions made by and on behalf of the player, the disciplinary committee determined that although there had been head contact and an act of foul play occurring within the incident, the offending did not reach the red card threshold.

“Rather, the evidence established that the initial contact made by the player was directly to the shoulder of Italy 10 with there being “daylight” between the shoulder contact and head/neck area of Italy 10. Head contact was then found to have occurred, but was found to be secondary to the initial shoulder contact and made with much lower force and without the requisite level of “danger” required under World Rugby’s Head Contact Process to make the offending reach the red card threshold.

“The red card has accordingly been dismissed and will be expunged from the player’s disciplinary record.

“As a result, the player is now free to play and available for selection this weekend.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

33 Comments
H
Hammer Head 24 days ago

The death threats finally worked.


Relax. I’m joking.

D
DP 24 days ago

Just putting this here.. because one day it’ll be your team on the receiving end

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-AvlAPzkSA

H
Hammer Head 24 days ago

It’s really quite ridiculous.


The entire match, replay after replay of nothing incidents was being replayed.

L
Lerumo 24 days ago

Not until officials themselves get yellow or red carded will the game become truly professional. Alternatively, when a civil case is made by the affected sportsman/-woman for loss of income, and harm done to his/her reputation and career. A court case would look at intent to do bodily harm, mitigating conditions, reasonability criteria. In both SA locks’ case the conclusion would favour the “accused and on-field [bundu court style] sentenced” largely. Conversely, the on-field officials would be implicated for NOT using the capacitating means to their disposal (time and greater panel of [perceived] objective adjudicators, and supportive technology). And off-field officials would be implicated for either not seeing what the rest of the world could clearly see, or [wilfully? naively?] misinterpreting or wilfully ignoring the hard evidence. Guilty they will be. Guilty they are. Objective adjudication is a function, not a persona to be protected at all cost. They will one day be replaced by technology. They might as well prolong their utility by making technology their ally.

A
Alias 24 days ago

The ref could have erred on the side of caution and given a yellow with bunker review. Straight red was senseless, and is a risk for the game.

D
DP 24 days ago

Just send it directly to the bunker and let them decide before you give a straight red, it’s so daft - clearly bent - tackler falling into the tackle due to already being tackled - same as Lood. Send it to the bunker and let them have a closer look. You’ve got a Welsh player CLEARLY kicking at Materas head - with video evidence and he gets off free - THAT is malicious intent, just plain stupid.

F
Flankly 24 days ago

Having conducted a detailed review of all available evidence, including all camera angles


The ref should have cited the “balance of probabilities” instead of referring to the tape. That worked in the JH Wessels case.


The problem with reviewing the tape is that it limits the ability for the panel to make arbitrary and/or biased decisions.

D
DP 24 days ago

Well said - farcical at best.

D
Dave Didley 24 days ago

Uncommonly sensible from them!


CTE shouldn’t be an occupational hazard but these are simply rugby collisions that are being carded.


If they want player safety, then go all in - height and weight limits per position, mandatory scrum caps, padded body protection, maximum player minutes in any given window etc. BUT PLEASE lay off with the cards!


A smashing weekend of contests ahead and I’m sure the cards will still be the talking point. What an insult to the players.

H
Hammer Head 24 days ago

What makes you think they’re not heading there Dave?


Slowly slowly they’ll take us there.

M
Mr Easy 24 days ago

The right decision in the end, but that doesn’t retrospectively give SA back a man for 70 mins. They managed to win somehow anyway, but should not have been in that position and in a different game that could have been significant, terrible refereeing.

H
Hammer Head 24 days ago

All fun and games until it costs someone a World Cup.


20 minute reds and then throw the book at them at citing if you must. But stop ****ing up the game.

H
Hammer Head 24 days ago

Give the TMO and the relevant officials a 4-5 week ban!

G
GrahamVF 24 days ago

I sincerely hope this is a chastening lesson for card happy foul play review officials. I absolutely agree with head contact protocols but why not allow the tmo’s the time and space to review properly jand upgrade to permanent red with no replacement instead of the ref having to make that decision under crowd and time pressure on the field? ppp

P
PR 24 days ago

Can I assume the TMO who made the spurious claim that there was head contact will be sanctioned or will there be zero accountability as always?

D
DP 24 days ago

He’s French - they have history with these sort of nefarious actions so nothing will come of it…

J
Jimmy 24 days ago

The “Ref Team” do have a review, however its not published by World Rugby. Doleman and Co. will move down the pecking order and it’s unlikely that they will get a Tier one game during the 6 Nations.

J
Jacque 24 days ago

Lets be honest, TMO wanted to show the Ref foul play & he ALSO agreed it was foul play!😂😂

B
BE 24 days ago

TMO was headless when he made the decision

N
Ninjin 24 days ago

What can one say. It just shows how wrong some refs get it.

M
Mitch 24 days ago

Justice has been done.

H
Hammer Head 24 days ago

Not really. The culprits behind the crisis needing to be averted got off Scott free.


A rugby player loses a lot of money when banned for 4-5 weeks.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close
ADVERTISEMENT