Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Candidates to become new Chair of World Rugby confirmed

Sir Bill Beaumont CBE, Chairperson of World Rugby, looks on prior to the Rugby World Cup France 2023 Bronze Final match between Argentina and England at Stade de France on October 27, 2023 in Paris, France. (Photo by Julian Finney - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

Three former Test forwards have been confirmed as the candidates to replace Sir Bill Beaumont as Chair of World Rugby once his second term in office runs its course in the middle of next month.

ADVERTISEMENT

France’s Abdelatif Benazzi is arguably the best-known of the trio after a 78-cap career for Les Bleus. Benazzi has been nominated by France, who he represented between 1990 and 2001, and seconded by South Africa.

The 56-year-old will be running against fellow lock and former Italy international, Professor Andrea Rinaldo, whose candidacy has been endorsed by Italy and seconded by Ireland, while ex-Wallaby, Brett Robinson, the youngest of the trio, has been put forward by his own country and seconded by England.

If elected, Robinson would become the first person from the Southern Hemisphere to hold the role since its inception in 1996.

The three candidates will contest the election for the Chair of World Rugby at the Interim Meeting of Council in Dublin, Ireland, on November 14.

Meanwhile, two World Rugby Hall of Fame inductees are among the 13 nominees for the six available positions on the World Rugby Executive Board. They are Rugby World Cup-winning captain John Eales and former Vice-Chair of World Rugby, Agustin Pichot.

At the November 14th meeting, the 52 members of Council will first elect the new Chair, followed by six Executive Board members, from whom the Vice-Chair will be chosen.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

36 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

284 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT