Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Brad Mooar says Scotland can't wait to 'get into it' against Tonga

By PA
Scotland's Brad Mooar

Brad Mooar is adamant Scotland cannot allow themselves to be weighed down by the pressure of chasing big victories as they bid to prolong their World Cup into the knockout phase.

ADVERTISEMENT

After losing their opening match against South Africa, the Scots will almost certainly require bonus-point wins over unfancied pair Tonga and Romania across the next two weekends if they are to keep their hopes of reaching the quarter-finals alive going into their final pool B match against Ireland in Paris.

However, assistant coach Mooar insisted Scotland – renowned for their prolific scoring – must keep calm and focus predominantly on playing to their best rather than allowing the chase for points to influence their mindset.

“If you start thinking about points, then you miss the moment that’s in front of you,” he said.

“For us, that’s something that will take care of itself at the end of the game.

“If we get our parts of the game right, on both sides of the ball, it’ll take care of itself.

“The pressure that we can create with our defence and offensive game, winning the ball back and playing off that, playing smart and with variation, that stuff takes care of itself.

“If we get too far ahead of ourselves, thinking about types of spreadsheets that need to be kept for tie-breakers at the end of the pool, then we miss the opportunity and threats in front of us.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

Scotland were idle last weekend so have had plenty of time to banish any negativity from their Springboks defeat. Mooar insisted the players’ morale remains as high as ever as they bid to get back on track against Tonga in Nice on Sunday.

“We have the utmost confidence, nothing’s been dented,” he stressed. “If we were in the business of having a confidence crisis after one match, then you’re in the wrong game.

“It’s a game that requires resilience, perspective, persistence and utter belief. We’ve got that.

“We’re learning all the time and trying to be better. We can’t wait to get into it against Tonga on Sunday.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Mooar, speaking on Thursday afternoon, confirmed that Scotland have a clean bill of health as Gregor Townsend prepares to name his team for Tonga on Friday morning.

“No, I think we’re tracking quite nicely,” he said. “Everyone is on board and ready to go.”

Fixture
Rugby World Cup
Scotland
45 - 17
Full-time
Tonga
All Stats and Data
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

W
Wayneo 58 minutes ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

Some interesting stats that just proved what my first impression of NZ’s drive to speed up Rugby Union would amount to - fine margins here and there to cut a few seconds off the game and nothing else. To do more there would have to be wholesale changes to the game like doing away with scrums, lineouts and bringing back the ELV’s to have free kicks instead of penalties. Very little chance of it happening but, in the end, Ruby Union would be a 15-man version of Rugby League. There are reasons why Rugby Union is globally more popular that Rugby League and what NZ are also not considering is the unintended consequences of what they want to achieve. This will end up turning Rugby Union into a low value product that will not be acceptable to the paying public. If people really wanted a sped-up version of rugby, then why is Rugby Union globally way more popular than Rugby League? Rugby lovers all over the world are also not stupid and have seen through what NZ are trying to achieve here, selfishly to bring back their glory days of dominance over every other nation and compete with Rugby League that is dominant in Australasia. NH countries just don’t have the cattle, or the fantastic weather needed to play like NZ SR franchises do so good luck to whoever has to try and convince the NH to accept going back to the days of NZ dominance and agreeing to wreck the game in the process. I have serious doubts on the validity of the TV stats presented by GP. All they did was expand the broadcasting base by putting it on free to air, not even any indication of arresting the continued drop in viewership. Match day attendance goes hand in hand with broadcast ratings so if there was an increase in the one you should expect to see it with the other. However, the drop in match day attendance is very evident to the casual highlights package viewer. The only club who looks to be getting solid attendance is the Drua. I am calling it now that NZ’s quest to speed up the game will fail and so will the vote on the 20-minute red card.

12 Go to comments
S
Sam T 2 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

All of these media pundits always miss the obvious whenever they analyse what is ailing or assisting the game. Rugby always has contentious points for debate when picking apart individual games and finding fault with itself. All this focus and scrutiny on “speeding up the game”, “high ball in play” etc is all contextual to the fan. As a tv viewer, if you’re absorbed into a game, regardless if your team is playing or not, more ball in play time and action are all byproducts of the contest. A good contest subliminally affects your memory in selectively remembering all the good aspects. A poor contest and your brain has switched off because its a blowout and the result is never in doubt or it’s a real chore to watch and remain engaged throughout. The URC, Top 14 and English premiership are all competitions that feel like there’s real jeopardy each week. The dominance of Super rugby by NZ teams was unhealthy from a sustainable interest perspective. You can’t fault those teams or the players, but the lack of competitions won by SA and Australian teams long term was always going to test the faith and patience of die-hard and casual fans from those regions. SANZAR took their eye off the fans and fans voted with their feet and subscriptions. They were so concerned about expanding their product they forgot the golden rule about broadcasting live sport. Viewers tune in more when there’s an atmosphere and a true contest. You need to fill stadiums to create one, host unions need to do more to service ticket buyers, and this year proves the other, there’s more interest in Super rugby this year only because more games are competitive with less foregone conclusions. All these micro statistics bandied about, only interest the bean counters and trainspotters.

12 Go to comments
B
Bull Shark 7 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

I’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.

12 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Is South America rugby's new promised land? Is South America rugby's new promised land?
Search