Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Bok boss Rassie Erasmus gives hot-take response on Etzebeth incident

Rassie Erasmus with AR Matthew Carley - PA

South Africa’s record demolition of Wales ended under a cloud as Eben Etzebeth was sent off in the final seconds for a clear thumb to the eye of Alex Mann, with Rassie Erasmus conceding afterwards that the footage “didn’t look good” despite uncertainty over what sparked the clash.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Springboks had cruised to an 11-try victory in Cardiff before tempers flared at the death, Mann squaring up to Etzebeth after the replay screens inside the Principality Stadium showed the veteran lock’s thumb making contact with his eye.

Referee Luc Ramos issued a straight red, and the two forwards exchanged words again in an icy post-match handshake picked up by the TNT cameras.

VIDEO

Erasmus didn’t attempt to soften the optics.

“I don’t know what I can say that isn’t controversial. It didn’t look good.

“It was a justified red card. It’s definitely not the way we’d have liked to have ended the game. The optics weren’t great.”

The incident overshadowed what had been a ruthless South African showing, their physical dominance exposing a Welsh side running on fumes by the final quarter.

But the image that lingered after the one-sided affair was Mann’s fury and Etzebeth trudging off to another blast of boos from the home crowd.

Wales coach Steve Tandy offered little in return. “I’m not going to comment in detail. You can see something. If it is what it is, it’s not a great look,” he said, stopping short of passing judgement while acknowledging the seriousness of the contact.

ADVERTISEMENT

Springboks captain Siya Kolisi attempted to contextualise the moment, insisting there was no intent from his teammate. “I’m sure he didn’t mean to do that on purpose,” said Kolisi. “You go for an eye gouge, you know what happens after that. We said sorry to the guy already but I don’t want that to be the highlight of the day, it’s been a good day.”

The studio discussion was more direct, although both Welsh pundits said they’d be surprised if there was intent from the giant Springbok enforcer.

Sam Warburton echoed Kolisi’s belief that Etzebeth wouldn’t deliberately jeopardise himself in a match already long won, but he drew a hard line on the offence. “Yeah, without a doubt,” he said when asked about the likelihood of a ban. “It’s one of those that is a non-negotiable. I kind of understand what Siya is saying, because Etzebeth is 34 years old, he’s got over 100 caps and he’s played the game a million times. He knows you can’t do that, so I don’t know if it was his intention. But, intention or not, any finger contact into the eye is straight red and nobody can argue that.”

Dan Biggar came to a similar conclusion. “I agree with Sam. There’s no way he’s intentionally gone to do that, especially with the score as it is,” he said. “There’s no real need to have any niggle in the game almost, but he’s probably going to find himself in a little bit of bother and having a few weeks on the sidelines.”

ADVERTISEMENT


To be first in line for Rugby World Cup 2027 Australia tickets, register your interest here 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

14 Comments
L
Lerumo 14 days ago

Fame does not by default equate valid opinion, BH. To not commit a deliberate act that may cause grievious bodily harm because you might be exposed afterwards does not earn you credibility. On the contrary, it makes you hypocrite or cunning. EE should be served a civil charge. I am SAn, by the way.

N
NxxTX 13 days ago

“Why did he do that?” Everyone asks. Because he was angry with the guy thats why. You cant have it both ways. You can't have a toughie like him in your team AND say now Eben, what'd you have to go and get wound up for?!

Not saying eye-gouging is tough, but he's no choir boy and thats ok!


🖤🤍

B
BH 15 days ago

I don’t know why Eben, one of the best locks in history, would want to eye gouge an opponent, when he has 2 world cups and a top reputation as one of the nicest and toughest guys in the world, and he was playing in a team that was winning the game by 70+ points. What does he have left to prove to his opponents? Is his ego that fragile, soft and/or big that he has to act this way? It’s pathetic.

J
Jon 15 days ago

Congrats to SA on an awesome performance, not for the score line but as Andre the man of the match said in his post match interview, they kept to the script and didn’t let the game get loose. That demonstrated the control of the team and also the coaches to hold that discipline…well accept for Eben.

Unfortunately that moment of madness when the red mist descended was not a savoury incident and whatever the so called mitigation might be, the TV footage shows him looking at Alex Mann as he eye gouged him. The sport needs to make a stand and give him a heavy ban, which I am sure they will.

I hope the Saffa supporters and online fans don’t start trying to defend or play down his actions. There is no defence! The incident should not tarnish an amazing career, but it is not the first time we have seen that look on his face….Allan Alaalatoa as an example.

Anyway, well played SA…wish we could have given you some better competition.

E
Ed the Duck 14 days ago

Tough to see how much less than a year on the sidelines will result from this, the pictures did not look good.

D
Dave Didley 15 days ago

Schalk Burger’s still follows him around 16 years later.


The big lad has just torpedoed his reputation. It's on a par with failing a drugs test.


Insane from a 141 cap test international.

H
Henrik 15 days ago

It doesn’t look good …. indeed

E
Eric Elwood 15 days ago

Pressure on thumb into the eye socket only stopped when Mann moved his head back to escape.


“How it happened and why it happened, whether it was provoked, I’m not sure.”


Etzebeth claiming there might be mitigation and having more words with the player after the match shows no remorse.


Throw the book at him.


NB The argument “Nobody would intentionally plan to do that, therefore it couldn’t be intentional” is utter nonsense.

E
Ed the Duck 14 days ago

I wonder if the panel will be more likely to call you to give evidence than bona fide ex int’ls Eric? Better clear your diary just in case…

J
J Marc 15 days ago

David Attoub ,2010, without any picture or vidéo : 70 weeks….

E
E M 15 days ago

We will see if WR shame themselves with a double standard that depends on the colour of the jersey. A Frenchman gets 70 weeks without any video evidence. With all the evidence, let's see how long a South African gets.

J
JJ 15 days ago

Kyle Sinclair only 9 weeks. Richard Loe got 6 months.

s
sorrel 15 days ago

If you’re looking directly at a man’s face while putting your thumb into his eyes, it will be hard to argue to the citing committee that it was a big whoospie. I understand Kolisi saying he isn’t sure it was intentional because it’s a post match interview and a good captain doesn’t throw his players under the bus, but if it’s bad enough that Rassie says the red is justified, then it’s pretty bad.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close
ADVERTISEMENT