Analysis: Why the Blues need to play Rieko Ioane at 13
Superstar Rieko Ioane put up a decent stat line in the Blues agonising 41-34 defeat against the Highlanders last week– 75 run metres on 12 carries, with five defenders beaten and four clean breaks, showing flashes of his explosive talent.
The stats might look pretty, but in reality, most of this came from counter-attack and generally very little from set-piece and only in specific circumstances in phase play.
When you look into this deeper the Blues are not using Ioane effectively, at least not to his maximum potential, and the Chiefs and every other team are going to thank them for it.
The Blues are going to run into real problems this year based on what we saw last Friday night and run the risk of wasting Ioane’s talent on the wing. Head coach Tana Umaga explained earlier this year his reasoning for leaving Ioane on the wing.
“I said to him it’s hard when he’s the world’s best left wing so it’s his own fault at the moment.
One key difference is missing here – the Blues are not the All Blacks. What Ioane does for the All Blacks on the wing cannot be expected at the Blues. The All Blacks create space for Ioane on the wing, the Blues don’t.
Blues problems run deep
What we learned against the Highlanders is the Blues are trying to play shockingly deep. This structure is going to hamper Ioane’s ability to get quality ball in space all season long during phase play.
The depth in itself isn’t the problem. The issues develop when the Blues backs remain static and pass directly backward instead of flat and ‘out in front’ of the player. This starts with Gatland at 10 and exacerbates as the play goes on.
The starting depth combined with deeper passing results in huge gain line losses for the Blues.
Here Gatland’s catch’n’pass is almost in the same spot and Collins is not much better. By the time Collins receives the ball, the play is already 13 metres behind the gain line.
The Highlanders rush defence is able to sprint up as there are really no flat options for the Blues.
By the time Sonny Bill Williams receives the ball, Rob Thompson is in his face and is able to tackle him for a 15-metre loss.
Sonny Bill Williams is almost stationary when he receives the ball meaning Rieko Ioane outside of him also has to stop. If Williams offloads, Ioane would be standing still with Walden (12) closing in.
Again, we see Gatland passing deep to Collins far behind the gain line and the decoy runners nowhere near the advancing defensive line as viable options.
Once Matt Duffy (14) receives the ball he is monstered by Tevita Li (11) for another big loss.
Here again, none of the backs have moved off their mark and Gatland has already released his pass.
The next man is under so much pressure by the time he receives it he has to fling it on awkwardly. George Moala and Sonny Bill Williams are standing still outside him, with zero momentum.
The clunky pass is fired above Williams’ head and Tevita Li is easily able to cover the overlap.
We have seen in recent years when sides try to play with a ‘game managing’ 10, they fall back into this type of deep structure, which only results in disaster.
The Reds with Jake McIntyre tried the same thing and were cannon fodder for teams with rapid line speed. You cannot stand still and shovel wide to your weapons.
The Blues are looking to employ similar tactics but will find it extremely difficult against all the New Zealand sides that all adopt vicious rush tactics. Even if they are able to successfully spread the ball to Ioane, he will often be static and 15 metres behind the gain line.
Gatland was far more promising in the first half when he attacked the line and played on the run instead of the ‘stand and shovel’ pass that developed as the game went on.
The Blues deep attack is usually limited to when they try to release the open side. Their short side is generally much flatter, and this is where they found success on numerous occasions against the Highlanders.
Ioane might be world’s best wing, but is Moala a better centre?
George Moala is a run-dominant player – which is a nicer way of saying he doesn’t pass the ball often.
There is a reason why Moala is no longer in contention for the All Blacks. Younger more rounded centres like Jack Goodhue have surpassed him. He is obviously capable of passing the ball as seen in the try above, but often misses opportunities to utilise space on the outside when he is covered, favouring contact instead.
The Blues have a lineout play inside the Highlanders 22 early in the match and Moala finds himself pressured by Rob Thompson as he receives the ball. With two men outside him, quick hands by Moala could release Ioane for a try scoring opportunity.
Waisake Naholo (14) is trying to close the outside space but is angling in. If Moala can get the ball to Collins, he will already be outside of Naholo giving the Blues a massive scoring opportunity.
Moala tries to take on Thompson on the outside and is swallowed by the Highlanders cover defence.
Again right before halftime, Moala has an opportunity down the short side to play numbers and free up Ioane inside the 22.
He engages his opposite forcing Naholo to cover two players. All that is required is a simple pass and the next man can free Ioane.
He takes it into contact and the opportunity is lost.
Without a ball-playing 13, Ioane is going to have limited opportunities on the end of the Blues backline. When you have the deadliest player on the field and don’t use him enough, the missed opportunities add up in a game only decided by 7 points.
The one set-piece play Ioane was used on was a simple crash ball running off 9. There was no creative play design to use Ioane in wider channels. This stunning play by the All Blacks created space for him outside the centre channel and he took advantage.
The All Blacks create space for Ioane, the Blues don’t.
The case for 13
The reasoning above argues that Ioane will be wasted on the wing this year but doesn’t outline the benefits the Blues will get from actually having Ioane at centre. Without going into too much detail, these are fairly obvious.
He will have the opportunity to get more touches on both sides of the field. We saw Ioane’s freakish offload in the lead up to Matt Duffie’s try on the right-hand side of the field. There is no reason why he couldn’t provide more of that in the 13 jersey.
He has the ball-skills Moala doesn’t, plus the speed and breakaway ability. He will draw in more attention from defenders but has the ability to capitalise on it – by getting away offloads in the tackle. George Moala would actually benefit more being outside Ioane.
The Blues have depth issues in attack, but having the dangerous Ioane there could still work. Even under pressure, he will be a better chance at shaking off the first defender and opening something up.
The move will benefit both Ioane and Moala, and ultimately the Blues. They must do what is best for them.
Ioane is the world’s best wing because he is in the world’s best team – the All Blacks.
The Blues aren’t, they need him at 13.
Comments on RugbyPass
He is right , the Crusaders will be a threat. Scott Barrett, ( particularly), Fergus Burke , Codie Taylor, ( from sabbatical) etc due back soon for the Crusaders. There are others like Zach Gallagher too. People can right the Crusaders off, Top 8 , here we come !!
1 Go to commentsWe will always struggle for money to match the other sides but the least the WRU can do is invest properly in Welsh rugby. Too much has been squandered on vanity projects like the hotel and roof walk amongst others which will never see a massive return. Hanging the 4 pro sides out to dry over the last decade is now coming back to bite the WRU financially as well as on the pitch. You reap what you sow.
1 Go to commentsWhat do you get if you cross a doctor with a fish? A plastic sturgeon
14 Go to commentsWhat happened to feleti Kaitu’u? Hasnt played in a while right?
1 Go to commentsGregor I just can’t agree with you. You are trying to find something that just isn’t there. Jordie Barrett has signed until 2028. By the end of that he would have spent probably 11-12 years on Super Rugby and you say he can’t possibly have one season playing somewhere else. It is absurd. What about this scenario, the NZR play hard ball and he decides to leave and play overseas. How would that affect the competition. There seems to be an agenda by certain journalists to push certain agendas and don’t like it when it’s not to their liking. I fully support the NZR on this. Gregor needs to get a life.
2 Go to commentsHope he stays as believe he can do a great job.
1 Go to commentsMake what step up? Manie has a World Cup winner’s medal around his neck and changed the way the Springboks can play. He doesn’t have anything to prove to anyone. The win record of the Boks with him in the team is tremendous. Sacha can be wonderful and I hope he has a very succesful Bok career, but comparing him to Manie in terms of the next Bok flyhalf is very strange. Manie is the incumbent (not the next) and doing pretty incredibly.
1 Go to comments00 😍 U
1 Go to commentsSabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.
2 Go to commentsJake White talks more sense than anything I've read in the last 5 years. Hope someone's listening.
9 Go to commentsThe Springboks tried going down the road of only picking home-based players and it was an unmitigated disaster in 2016 and 2017. Picking overseas-based players has been one of the main reason the Boks have done so well since 2018, not only because of the quality Rassie could call on, but because of the knowledge and experience those players brought into camp from England, France and Japan. With some of the big names playing abroad it also gave younger players in SA the chance to break through at franchise level. Would we have seen the emergence of a Ruan Nortje if RG and Lood were still at the Bulls? Not so sure. I understand why Jake would want to block players leaving since his job depends on good results but it’s an approach that would take Bok rugby back to the bad old days and no South African wants to see that.
9 Go to commentsExeter were thumped by 38 points. And they only had to hop on a train.
39 Go to commentsI am De Groot.
1 Go to commentsHad hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”
11 Go to commentsWhat was the excuse for the other knockout blowouts then? Does the result not prove the Saints were just so much better? Wise call to put your eggs in one basket when you’ve got 2 comps simultaneously finishing.
39 Go to commentsReally hope Kuruvoli and his partner rock the Canes.
1 Go to commentsI wonder what impact Samson has had on their attack, as the team seems less prone to trundle it up the middle, take the tackle and then trundle it up again. I lost faith in the coach last year as the Rebelss looked like a 2nd/3rd rate South African team. I also disliked Gordon standing back, often ignored as the forward battle went on and on. Maybe its our Aussie way of not getting off our A***’s until the enemy is at the gate.
86 Go to commentsThanks for the write up. Great to see the Rebs winning, I am a little interested in how they will go against the remaining kiwi teams, I think they’ve only played Hurricanes and Highlanders but how great to see these players performing!! I also see Parling has a job beyond June 30! A good move by RA? Also how do you fix the Rebels previously scratchy defence?
86 Go to commentsbe smart - go black
14 Go to commentsNext week the Crusaders hopefully have Scott Barrett back. Will be great to have the captain back. Hopefully he will be the All Black captain as well.
12 Go to comments