Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Cleary takes swipe at Dolphins over recruitment

Coach Ivan Cleary of the Panthers. (Photo by Bradley Kanaris/Getty Images)

Ivan Cleary has taken a tongue-in-cheek swipe at the Dolphins, claiming the NRL’s newest franchise treat Penrith as if it is their own backyard for recruitment.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ivan Cleary has taken a subtle swipe at the Dolphins, accusing the NRL’s newest franchise of treating his Penrith club as their own recruiting backyard.

The Panthers fought off interest to re-sign teenage outside back Sunia Turuva and fellow local junior Lindsay Smith this week.

Related

Turuva in particular is believed to have caught the attention of the Dolphins, as well as powerhouse rookie winger Taylan May who re-signed last week.

Wayne Bennett’s club have already irked the Panthers by signing young half Isaiya Katoa, while Robert Jennings is also set to head north next year.

The 17th franchise have also been linked to both Stephen Cricthon and Brian To’o for 2024, with the NSW State of Origin pair signed with Penrith until the end of next year.

“One thing is for sure we are going to keep bringing guys through our system, that’s our mandate,” Cleary said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It has been well documented we have our challenges in terms of trying to keep this team together.

“To be able to have those (young) guys stay on when they definitely had options to go elsewhere … is so good.

“Everyone is looking at our club now, particularly with the Dolphins coming in. They’re treating our club like their backyard.

“So it’s going to be even harder.”

Cleary’s comment was said with a tongue-in-cheek expression, but comes after then-Penrith CEO Brian Fletcher claimed it was a “waste of time” developing players and wanted compensation when the Dolphins signed Katoa in February.

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile Cleary said he was hopeful his six NSW Origin stars would back up to face Newcastle on Sunday, while preparing as if they wouldn’t.

Related

The Panthers’ 30-18 win over Canterbury last Friday came after the Panthers dropped two games through last year’s Origin period, in easily their patchiest part of their premiership season.

“It was a bit of a milestone for our club last week,” Cleary said.

“The same period last year was a bit of a failure, I must say. It was really pleasing to see how they prepared and performed last week.

“It definitely gives us a bit more confidence. I think it just shows a bit more growth in our team this year.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cw 4 hours ago
The coaching conundrum part one: Is there a crisis Down Under?

Thanks JW for clarifying your point and totally agree. The ABs are still trying to find their mojo” - that spark of power that binds and defines them. Man the Boks certainly found theirs in Wellington! But I think it cannot be far off for ABs - my comment about two coaches was a bit glib. The key point for me is that they need first a coach or coaches that can unlock that power and for me that starts at getting the set piece right and especially the scrum and second a coach that can simplify the game plans. I am fortified in this view by NBs comment that most of the ABs tries come from the scrum or lineout - this is the structured power game we have been seeing all year. But it cannot work while the scrum is backpeddling. That has to be fixed ASAP if Robertson is going to stick to this formula. I also think it is too late in the cycle to reverse course and revert to a game based on speed and continuity. The second is just as important - keep it simple! Complex movements that require 196 cm 144 kg props to run around like 95kg flankers is never going to work over a sustained period. The 2024 Blues showed what a powerful yet simple formula can do. The 2025 Blues, with Beauden at 10 tried to be more expansive / complicated - and struggled for most of the season.

I also think that the split bench needs to reflect the game they “want” to play not follow some rote formula. For example the ABs impact bench has the biggest front row in the World with two props 195cm / 140 kg plus. But that bulk cannot succeed without the right power based second row (7, 4, 5, 6). That bulk becomes a disadvantage if they don’t have a rock solid base behind them - as both Boks showed at Eden Park and the English in London. Fresh powerful legs need to come on with them - thats why we need a 6-2 bench. And teams with this split can have players focused only on 40 minutes max of super high intensity play. Hence Robertson needs to design his team to accord with these basic physics.



...

220 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT