Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'We'll all be in for a helluva journey': Ex-All Blacks legend weighs in on coaching debate

By Campbell Burnes
Ian Foster and Scott Robertson. (Photos / Getty Images)

May the best man win.

That is the view of former All Blacks lock and SKY TV rugby analyst Ian Jones as we count down to the (probable) announcement next week of the new All Blacks coaching team.

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite 26 coaches being shoulder-tapped to apply for the vacant position, it appears it is now a two-horse race between 2012-19 All Blacks assistant coach Ian Foster and 2017-19 Super Rugby-winning Crusaders coach Scott Robertson.

The Season: Hamilton Boys High School – Episode 4

Video Spacer

“Ultimately, I’ll back whoever gets the job. I played with Fozzie at the Chiefs and with Razor at the All Blacks. I’m adamant that I’ll support whoever it is 100 percent,” says Jones.

“You’ve got the established, the status quo, with Fozzie. He’s a details man. The players know where they stand with him and the direction they are heading. It looks like the team he is putting together is New Zealand to the core.

“On the flip side, Steve Hansen told us that Foster was coaching at the peak of his powers and yet we got spanked by England. If he’s at the top of his game, is he going to improve? That might be a wake-up call. Hansen’s record was amazing, but you need to look at the last two years from the Lions tour. What did we learn from the losses and how did we improve? Foster was part of all that.”

Robertson represents the new breed with a new broom. The last time New Zealand Rugby made a clean break with the previous regime was in 2003-04 when Graham Henry ousted John Mitchell.

“He will bring a new direction and purpose. That’s exciting for the public, because this is New Zealand’s team, not just the union’s. NZR is a conservative lot historically and they haven’t often deviated from that status quo. If it’s Razor, then we’ll all be in for a helluva journey, and that will be exciting too,” says Jones.

ADVERTISEMENT

He acknowledged the importance of having the right running mates. Failure to nail down that detail cost Robbie Deans when he applied for the All Blacks job in 2007. Scott McLeod, who did sterling work with the All Blacks’ defence in 2019, will surely feature in the thoughts of either Foster or Robertson.

“I don’t have the inside oil on who Razor’s running mates are, but there was talk of Ronan O’Gara. Mick Byrne’s been a resource coach for the All Blacks in the past and no disrespect to O’Gara, who’s clearly a very good coach, but do we need a non-New Zealander among the coaches?”

https://www.instagram.com/p/B5muWmMA4Pf/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

It’s a fair question.

Jones does not see anything abnormal in having 26 original candidates whittled down to two credible contenders. Several withdrew from the running, of course.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I was excited by the potential of Jamie Joseph and Tony Brown, but that didn’t pan out. That hard-nosed directness of Jamie and the inventiveness of Brown might have been a good fit. The option of Razor to change direction might be a good thing, but it will come down to who his team is.”

“Calling on several candidates to apply is the way they’ve always done it. Back in the day, they always contacted all the NPC coaches to apply. When Brad Meurant was with North Harbour, he was flown down to Wellington for an interview. I don’t criticise them for shoulder-tapping all the people they have, because you never know until you ask sometimes.”

Jones played under three All Blacks coaches – Alex ‘Grizz’ Wyllie, Laurie Mains and John Hart. The latter was knocked back three times before finally ascending to the position in 1996, the right man to lead the All Blacks into the professional age. But he missed out in 1987, 1991 and again in 1994, when he challenged Mains after a mediocre All Blacks’ season.

The issue of senior player consultation is an interesting one and Jones has firm views on that.

“I was never asked my opinion as a senior player when they were choosing a new coach. I don’t know if you should be, either. Human nature dictates that you say what suits you the best. Coach A picked me and knows my style, so of course I’ll go with him every day of the week. It puts the players in an awkward position. At the end of the day, it’s an employment situation and you don’t get to pick who your boss is going to be,” says Jones.

“Having said that, input from departing senior players (such as Kieran Read and Ben Smith) and management will be crucial,” says Jones.

Interviews are expected to take place next week in Wellington.

In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 3 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING England seek out overthrown head coach to spark attack England seek out forgotten head coach to spark attack
Search