Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Warren Gatland's shock revelation: I suspected Wales player of doping

By Online Editors
Warren Gatland. (Photo by Michael Steele/Getty Images)

By NZ Herald

Warren Gatland has admitted he had suspicions that a Welsh player had been using performance enhancing drugs.

The issue of doping has been one of interest in recent weeks in the rugby world, and in an interview with Off the Ball, the former Welsh coach said in his time at the helm, there was one player he coached who he was suspicious of.

“You know I haven’t come across personally any players that I’ve coached from a Wales perspective that I would – well sorry, maybe one. Maybe one, now that I think about it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

When asked if the person in question played for Wales, Gatland responded: “He may have done, yeah.”

Gatland clarified by pointing out that he had no hard proof that the player was doping, but that teammates had made jokes about it.

“It’s probably a little bit unfair of me to say I had suspicions about one of them because I’ve got no evidence or anything like that.

“Because it’s kind of like just saying, ‘Is there a possibility?’… It was more like a couple of people making jokes sort of thing. And you go, ‘Oh is that…’

“Truth in humour?,” presenter Joe Molloy asked. “Yeah, exactly,” Gatland responded.

The issue of performance enhancing drugs has become a talking point in rugby after former Ireland player Neil Francis wrote a scathing column for the Irish Times which said saying the sporting world can be “fairly certain” that there is a “steroid culture in a country that has just won the World Cup”.

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1195028690800988165

Ahead of the tournament, South Africa saw young winger Aphiwe Dyantyi suspended after testing positive for a banned substance. Dyantyi was tested at a Springbok training camp in early July. It was initially reported that he had a hamstring problem, but in late August it was revealed he had returned a positive test.

Dyantyi, who could be banned for four years, protested his innocence saying he had never cheated and “taking any prohibited substance would not only be irresponsible and something that I would never intentionally do, it would also be senseless and stupid.”

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1194970722092953607

But Francis argued that the test results painted a very different picture.

“Dyantyi’s statement was released immediately after his A sample results became public. It was a robust riposte,” Francis wrote.

“When the B sample results became known it was a bombshell – not one but three prohibited substances: Methandienone, Methyltestosterone and Ligandrol or LGD 4033.
“In my opinion that’s game, set and match. It is not the cocktail of drugs that will do him, it is how the cocktail works in conjunction with each other that is so damning.”

Gatland addressed Francis’ claims during his interview with Off the Ball, and said it was hard to know what Francis was trying to achieve with his piece.

“I thought Francis was pretty hard hitting in terms of the article he wrote about the South Africans… I kind of thought ‘was it being journalistic, or was it trying to take the gloss off South Africa or was it bitterness as well?’ I’m not sure about that.”

This article first appeared on nzherald.co.nz and was republished with permission.

In other news:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 10 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Charlie Cale may be the answer to Joe Schmidt's back-row prayers Charlie Cale may be the answer to Joe Schmidt's back-row prayers
Search