Northern | US

Wallabies won’t have a chance unless they can go through the Springboks

Harry Wilson and Rob Valetini of the Wallabies look on during The Rugby Championship match between Australia Wallabies and South Africa Springboks at Optus Stadium on August 17, 2024 in Perth, Australia. (Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)
Comments
57 Comments

The Springboks were frighteningly good against the All Blacks in their four-match Greatest Rivalry Tour; it laid bare just how physical, fit, and composed you must be to tussle with the Boks.

ADVERTISEMENT

That standard was on a different planet compared to what we have seen from the Wallabies to date in 2026, and this is something Wallabies coach Les Kiss is abundantly aware of ahead of the clash with the Springboks in Perth.

“The intensity of those matches (Greatest Rivalry Tour Tests) was right up there for sure,” Kiss said at his Wallabies squad unveiling in Canberra on Monday.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“But, if you watch all games, there are opportunities… but there is that intensity and physicality, so we’re a little bit removed from that certainly over the last four games.”

“We know we have to be better in certain areas… they’re in our backyard, so we will be up for the fight.”

Sure, the Wallabies have had purple patches, like when they dominated Ireland in the first stanza, but they haven’t been consistent, and that wasn’t even when Kiss was head coach.

Looking back at the Greatest Rivalry Tour, the All Blacks were valiant and exciting in their efforts, but ultimately came up well short.

ADVERTISEMENT

Across the four matches, they threw 738 passes for an average of 184 per match, making a total of 506 carries for an average of 126 per game, and although they scored 17 tries to the Boks’ 14, they walked away with nothing.

Most telling of all is perhaps that for all their ball movement and effort, they only made an average of 2.4 post-contact metres per carry, whereas the Boks averaged 3.2m, making more post-contact metres from almost 100 fewer carries.

That was the Boks’ power, their strength, their physical dominance.

The Wallabies cannot play the South Africans at their own game, but they can calculate that no amount of running rugby will get you around the Springboks in their current form.

The Wallabies must also concede they cannot play the wide-to-wide game better than the All Blacks; they don’t have more experienced players, nor do they have bigger or necessarily faster players.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Wallabies must couple their swing attack and wide play with players that can go through the Boks as well as defensive powerhouse players who can stop them in their tracks through the middle.

A selection quandary and task easier said than done.

The All Blacks found out first hand that at 3.2 post-contact metres per carry, the Springboks are deadly inside the 22m-zone and the Wallabies have struggled to keep opposition out in their D-zone at the best of times.

The All Blacks now know that free 22m entries off the back of poor discipline mean only one thing: Springbok tries.

It will mean the same for the Wallabies unless they find their starch in defence, especially in their D-zone as well.

While all this feels a little gloomy and obvious, it all now comes down to selection.

Kiss has unveiled the third Wallabies squad of his tenure, and he has stuck with the condensed unit of 34 players for this one-off match against the world champion Springboks.

Kiss has chosen 19 forwards and 15 backs, and he has welcomed back some old faces and some new ones as well.

Utility back Jordan Petaia is the most notable name on the list, back from a brief stint in the NFL and in the French Top 14, and he has now signed with the Urayasu D-Rocks in Japan Division One.

At 190cm and 102kgs Petaia is a big specimen and is the right profile of player for what the Wallabies will need against the Boks and if their gameplan is to succeed overall in the future.

However, after only managing 478 minutes at French Top 14 side Perpignan, which is less than a quarter of the possible 2080 minutes one can play during the regular season, not to mention Challenger Cup minutes, Petaia is anything but a sure thing after three years in the wilderness.

He is an exciting talent, as mentioned, the right profile, and covers multiple positions, but seeing as it is likely he is only available for the one Test, it is an interesting choice by Kiss, who says he just wants to get a look at Petaia.

Whether Kiss plays Petaia or not, the former Queensland Reds prodigy won’t be their silver bullet against the world champions; Kiss is going to have picked his biggest and meanest team at his disposal.

While there are players on the unavailable list who would aid that, Kiss must play the hand he has been dealt, or rather, the one he has chosen.

The Wallabies have secured the services of Exeter Chiefs’ Tom Hooper as well as Racing 92’s Taniela Tupou for this Springboks match, but they will be back in Europe for the Bledisloe clashes.

Nonetheless, in Perth, these two give the Wallabies starch in defence, as well as height and bulk at the set piece.

Whether the Wallabies can match the Boks at set piece is a live question, and while their lineouts have been stellar and scrumming decent, the Boks pack are different gravy with that eight-man shove.

In general play, the Boks belted the All Blacks and kept them to only 2.4m post-contact per carry.

To compare this to the Wallabies’ efforts: against Japan and Argentina the Wallabies only managed an average of 2.38m per carry against sides 11 and seven ranks lower than the Springboks.

With this stark figure in mind, Kiss must pick the gainline men in his pack, but he must also select the men who will be a nuisance at the breakdown and hitters in defence to slow down the green Wall of South Africa.

Three Wallabies forwards in the current squad managed 66% gainline or higher in Super Rugby Pacific 2026.

Rob Valetini and Fraser McReight notched up 66%, as well as Josh Canham, who got 67%.

After this, hooker Josh Nasser bagged 64%, and locks Lukhan Salakaia-Loto and Jeremy Williams secured 62% and 63%, respectively.

The rest of the pack all followed captain Harry Wilson, who managed 58% in a rough order down until 42% gainline.

Salakaia-Loto stands out in his ability to attract 2+ defenders for 75% of carries; the next best is Valetini on 71%. After these two, it falls away pretty quickly.

Making gainline often speaks to how the broader team is going, and against the Springboks it is going to be heavy and slow going if the Boks have it their way.

Therefore, the Wallabies must be dominant in the carry if things are going poorly on the momentum front.

Valetini, unsurprisingly, is the best in the Wallabies’ business at 39% dominant carry, but even Salakaia-Loto is a fair bit down the order on 31%.

To put this in context, guys like Marco Van Staden are at 49%, and Toulouse’s giant Emmanuel Meafou is at 47.5%

As for the rest of the Wallabies pack, only four others managed 30%: Cale, Tizzano, Canham, and McReight.

Put simply, the Wallabies have clear players they must pick if they hope to make the gainline and dominate the collisions.

On the unavailable list, Langi Gleeson and Will Skelton are two players who would drastically change this picture, which gives you hope for the future.

In the backline, Isaac Henry gives you the most gainline at 65%, Len Ikitau attracts 2+ defenders 72% of the time, and Henry makes the most dominant carries at 55% of the time.

Hunter Paisami is there or thereabouts with these numbers.

During the Kiss Tests, the numbers in his attack system paint a rather clear picture.

Ikitau, Henry, and Paisami beat defenders most frequently at one defender for every second carry for the former two, and one every five carries for Paisami.

On average, Ikitau and Paisami make the most post-contact metres at 2.6m and 2.5m, respectively; however, if you want linebreaks, you pick Henry, who makes a linebreak every six carries, which is much more frequent than any other.

Those numbers with ball in hand are positive enough for the Wallabies to hope they have a chance, but on the defensive side, things look a little shakier.

Only Salakaia-Loto has more than 10% dominant tackle stats, and despite most players tackle at 85% or higher, simply making tackles against the Boks won’t do.

But this is where Petaia may come in to shine.

Out of the entire Opta dataset, Petaia was the 18th most dominant tackler out of the entire SRP, French Top 14, URC, and English Prem at a whopping 14.3% dominant tackle rate, tackling at 81%.

Where Petaia falls in the Wallabies equation remains to be seen, but Kiss has said most likely “back three”, and apart from his height and bulk, his defensive physicality is the only stat that truly stands out when compared to the other back three squad members.

His ability to play centre, wing, and fullback of course makes him the ideal man for the 23 jumper, but as far as raw metrics go, he is not standing out as some may think.

The reason this article has focused on the pack and the centres is that these are the workhorses, the blokes who will be doing the most carrying, and while the gamedrivers will be just as crucial, the brute force needed to overcome the Boks is clear.

While being able to deal with and dish out blunt force trauma will be a deciding factor in Perth, ruling the skies is as imperative as keeping one’s discipline.

With all the numbers in front of us like this, put bluntly, the Wallabies have not shown to date that they have enough defensive starch to deal with the Boks, nor that they have enough punch from 1-15 to rack up the points needed.

Kiss will need to select shrewdly to get more than he has out of his men and his gameplan.

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

57 Comments
H
Hammer Head 23 days ago

The Springboks were frighteningly good against the All Blacks in their four-match Greatest Rivalry Tour

No. No, they weren’t. That’s what’s frightening.


The Boks are likely going to ring the changes and allow a few other players have a start. So the Wallabies may have the opportunity to spring a few surprises.

a
alan 23 days ago

Jorgo is hopeless in defense. Boks will gain many metres with him escorting the opposing ball carrier towards his own tryline.


If Wallabies do the basics right and tackle, they have a chance. No box kicks or no look passes please

J
John 23 days ago

Hey Alan, it’s a point I have been harsh on but he has indeed improved vastly since the Nations Champions we was bang average in July.

N
NH 24 days ago

Interesting piece John. I’m not sure I agree with your overall tenet though. For mine, i think it would have been more instructive to go back to the recent games the WBs won vs the boks and see what worked there (or NZ and IRE). Under rennie, I remember cleverly designed tactical ploys including pinning SA back and forcing them to goal line drop out with kicks finding grass, and clever set plays around the ruck to exploit tired forwards (inc. a slipper inside pop pass). I also remember valetini and marika successfully counter rucking. Last year, it was forwards arriving first at the breakdown and causing a mess there with lots of turnovers and electric backs on counter attack with wright and jorgo both having blinders with JOC throwing cutouts to width. The WBs need to muscle up enough not to get trounced in the scrum or at the gainline, i agree there. But, there is no point trying to beat the boks at their own game. When your opponent is big and strong, you should be small and nimble.


In saying all that, WBs have shown no ability to impose their game on their opponents so I struggle to see them winning really. Boks box kicking will cause havoc all game imo so backfield and our 10 will have to play a blinder. WBs should play to their lineout where they can compete, and then areas where the boks have been exposed - ireland exposed them with clever passing around their ruck, and NZ showed holes in their D if you can get the ball to the fringes. Kiss has to be smart enough to design plays to target those points.

J
John 23 days ago

I agree that we shouldn’t try beat them at their own game but we do need to be able to go route one with success if we are to be able to try move the ball. That is just rugby basics 101 because the Boks players are no slouches in the channels.


But yes, everytime Rennie beat them and Schmidt, we had a wide element to our game but we also made things hard in the contacts, gotta go in with a methodical and ruthless mindset.

P
Passit2me 24 days ago

Wright is probably hoping Petaia gets picked ahead of him at FB so he doesn’t have to tackle a Bok, and so am I.

J
John 23 days ago

LoL, let’s see what Kiss reckons!

T
TL 24 days ago

On a more straightforwardly serious note I think the big thing missing in these stats is what the forwards and players generally contribute to the breakdown. Speed to ruck, accuracy of clean, etc. will be a massive factor. I like Williams for this reason. And would be tempted to have Carlo on the bench,

J
John 23 days ago

Very much worht noting, but thankfully in selection there is not too much variation in that from a selection perspecitve as our best players are generally pretty decent in their alround games.

N
NH 23 days ago

Good point TL - disrupting the ruck was a big factor in Aus beating the boks in recent years, and for NZ in their game 1 win.

C
Cantab 24 days ago

Best of luck to the Aussies succeeding where the ABs failed as I don’t think that they have the ammunition to overcome the Boks. Australia has not been able to overcome the ABs for several seasons now and this years AB side although improved could still not match it with the Boks up front. An Aussie success against the Boks would be the upset of the century. Still it must be admitted that stranger things have happened.

R
Rugby3 24 days ago

Australia has not been able to overcome the AB’s for several seasons now …..because we have had kiwi coaches undermining us. There, fixed it for you.

N
NH 24 days ago

Like the WBs beating the boks in SA just last year…?

T
TL 24 days ago

Some good analysis there JF. I actually think the psychological battle is the only place where the Wallabies can get an edge, specially by being more blasphemous and heathen than the Boks. Despite being superficially big and tough, the Boks are actually quite vulnerable to proper heretical sledging. I think if we can muster the best Australian traditions of sledging and skulduggery then we are a chance (faking injuries, not to get penalties but to boil the blood of a Bok—aka Nick White). We need to draw on our reputation as iconoclasts and scoundrels to confuse these big men and make them start chasing shadows and thinking conspiratorially as they are prone to do. Then we are a chance. It’s a shame Nick White isnt available. I’d even consider drafting in Ricky Ponting and Steve Waugh, and especially considering Perth, Gilly to help with coaching this strategy.

J
John 23 days ago

Hahahaha this is the funniest comment I have read in a while, I genuinly loled, let’s see shall we.

T
Tooly 24 days ago

If Rassie runs that side out they will put 50 on us .

The ABs more .

We need Nick Berry or Gus !

T
Two Cents 25 days ago

The changes in the Boks side that comes to Perth, some of which we already know, means that the Wallabies won't be facing the same lineup that delivered dominance in the tour series.


That by no means makes it a weak team nor one that Australia should defeat. But it's not going to be a side that guarantees the Boks victory either with likely a very different pack and midfield.


And with the almost certain selection of Pollard at 10 that suggests to me two possible strategies: either that the Boks will bring a kick-heavy strategy, with the aim to pin Australia back in their half and rely on the Wallabies’ poor exits as well as lineout pressure to prevail. Or they'll be aiming to put Australia away through goals and lineout mauls due to penalties won at the scrum.


Neither of those is a particularly appetizing prospect given the relatively soft run Australia has had so far where even against the Irish and French they didn't face the up front challenge both sides normally bring and neither was Argentina the same threat they normally are.


The aerial examination given to the Wallabies in Brisbane which they failed badly recommends to me that it is the kick to win strategy rather than the scrum penalty strategy that the Boks will bring to Perth.


I think that's further supported by the definite inclusion Grobbelaar at hooker who is a better lineout thrower than he is a scrummager and there are better scrummaging hookers in SA rugby they could have brought if the scrum was where they were aiming to crush Australia.


I'll point to the last time the Boks played in Australia where they brought their first choice forward pack and simply smashed the Wallabies up front for 60 minutes in Brisbane and in Perth with the aim to lay down a marker.


Since they're bringing a very changed squad this time, clearly the focus is on something other than domination. As Rassie said himself they'll use this test in Perth as a sort of mini trial for guys who either didn't play during the series or who didn't get many minutes in order to test them under similar conditions to what they'll face next year.


No one who is in the setup for South Africa at the moment is surplus to requirements. Everyone who has been chosen in the squad is there because the coaches believe they'll play a part in the World Cup campaign. Thus, this is a perfect opportunity to give them action and to familiarize themselves.


Kiss obviously has to approach the test with a similar mindset. But the difference is that because Australia is hosting there is pressure on them to show even more progress which means that snagging a big scalp is not just a luxury but rather a requirement.


Since the aerial strat seems the most likely on the face of the selections Rassie has already strongly implied will be made for Perth, Kiss will have to select a team that can effectively counter the aerial threat and lineout maul whilst also exiting their half convincingly and consistently.


To that end, it would make sense to put JAS and Jordy into the back three alongside Potter, put Lenny Henry in the midfield and go with HMP and Lonergan in the halves. Then go with Bell, BPA and Triple A as the front, Canham and LSL behind with Hooper, Bobby V and Cale at the back.


Then bring on the likes of Nass, TT, Kailea, Williams, Shaw, McReight, Wilson, Donno and Kalani for a 6:2. That lineup has enough defensive starch in it to scrum and lineout well whilst being robust enough to repel any maul and to challenge well across the park.


But most importantly it creates a viable aerial counter by putting our strongest aerial players in the back three so should the Boks bring the kick to win strategy I expect them to the Wallabies will be able to combat it effectively.

J
John 23 days ago

They are all great points, but I question your back three selection with the mind that neither Petaia nor Suaalii are particularly noted kickers, and with the modern game requiring a fluid pendulum system, are we sure we want those two doing a chunk of the kicking? Just some food for thought.

B
Barefoot 24 days ago

I have no notes. This was ace 👌


It should be a cracking game.

G
GM 25 days ago

Those Super rugby stats won’t hold up against the Boks, but having said that, the Wallabies have more effective carriers up front than the ABs - Toupou, Bell, Canham, Valetini, Hooper and Wilson will put more pressure on the gainline than the ABs were able to do, particularly in that last test without Holland and Savea and Segner. Aumua was the one standout, while Blackadder worked hard but was crushed on the gainline. With Mike Cron coaching their scrum, and the Boks emotionally drained (or heavily rotated), I fancy the Wallabies’ chances in Perth.

u
unknown 25 days ago

I reckon wallabies have a good chance to do well. If Wilson plays he just needs to hold onto the ball more and keep the fancy 50/50 passes for another day. He is a big bloke who defends well.

K
KwAussie 25 days ago

One of the issues Kiss needs to address is how to leave JAS out without getting RA involved. When you look at those numbers he isn’t in the picture anywhere and his lack of rugby IQ along with his inability to kick or pass will mean he will be a liability if he is selected.

u
unknown 25 days ago

They just need to put JAS on the wing.

B
Barefoot 25 days ago

The All Blacks psyched themselves out in the RGR, they were their own worst enemies. The Boks left points on the field and gifted the ABs momentum at critical moments. The ABs frittered away those chances; I don’t expect the Wallabies to be as frivolous.


The Wallabies will be better in the set piece than the All Blacks were. They don’t need to beat the Boks at their own game, they just need to win enough space to play to their strengths. The ABs’ mistake was taking that space for granted without working for it, and they were caught short.


Traditionally the Boks do well in Perth and the rankings and form guide suggest the Boks should clinch it, but the Wallabies have had our number in the past and if we are not clinical they could surprise us.

K
KwAussie 25 days ago

“The Wallabies will be better in the set piece than the All Blacks were.” Not sure what evidence there is of this seeing as how they were worst against the teams they have both played so far this year. The article highlights what is needed but now the players need to step up.

T
Tah Man Too 25 days ago

The trio for the row has to be Canham, Williams and LSL. The loosies Wilson, FMC, Bobby and Hoops. If we can hold them for the first half, bringing on Hoops, LSL and a front row of Bell, BPA and TT would give us a chance. It's a challenge but we did it last year, and we do have the forwards who can go with them, as long as we can hang on in the scrum and keep some parity there. Gonna be tough, but go you good things!

J
John 23 days ago

I agree mate, gotta select the big dogs and tell them this is their opportunity to set the standard until the world cup!

R
Rugby3 25 days ago

Jeremy Williams is a great player but he just doesn’t seem big enough to be an international lock. I would pick Frost when he comes back before him, and Rodda. Both outstanding lineouts operators for starters.

H
HenryAU 25 days ago

Strong forward pack, if Bell and TT come off the bench they should hold their own. Likely that Ox and Louw will not make the trip after a big shift. Loosies I’d go Hooper, FMC and Bob with Cale off the bench. Bob and Hooper for combat, Cale when it opens up last 20.


I know they won’t as Wilson is captain but he is exactly the no 8 you don’t need against the Boks, looking for offloads and grubbers; and ending up with 25 carries for zero post contact meters. And likely a few penalties for poor tackle technique

S
Sinkingseabourn 25 days ago

They don't stand a chance! New coach but same old try this person- try this person! Once the players, particularly the backs knew each other’s game inside out! We are a second level team now.

u
unknown 25 days ago

It was critical for Les Kiss to try different combinations before playing the big dogs. He won’t be doing the same against All Blacks and Springboks. But then again his goal is the World Cup.

D
Dean 25 days ago

Can’t wait for this match, I know that my Wallabies are up against it and the current RSA Team is a joy to watch.


However, even though I know that RSA has us player for player, I don’t think we are a complete right off. Our forward pack that is available for selection is more than capable of parity at set piece with them.


I do worry about our 9/10 combo. Especially 10. Losing Gordon is a huge loss. Donaldson is a worry, as is Wright. Centre selection is going to be interesting.

J
John 23 days ago

Big selection calls loom! Let’s see how they go, Kiss has a lot of work to do with his co-coaches!

B
Barefoot 25 days ago

RSA has us player for player

… noting that the Bok veterans who put in big shifts against the ABs will likely stay home, so you will be up against less experienced players who have seen less recent game time in key positions, and the SA team will likely be less cohesive. There will be opportunities in the loose for the Wallabies to exploit that rustiness. I’ll be tracking McReight with interest, he should have a big part to play.


I’m sorry to see Gordon out — he looks a good player.

R
Rugby3 25 days ago

The suggestion the Wallabies should try and go thru the Springboks is pretty dumb. Suicidal in fact.

Because we have such terrifically athletic players, no team can play as fast as the Wallabies when they are on song. The Wallabies should give it a shot as a build up to the World Cup. It’s the only chance we have.

This does not mean flinging it around will nilly side to side either. It’s just a need for speed in actions and accuracy.

It might be a bit early to expect miracles but as least they and the fans will have fun trying.

N
NoLongerARuck 24 days ago

The All Blacks play faster and have better athletes than you. Its why they have dominated you for 20+ years in the Bledisloe

u
unknown 25 days ago

You can’t play fast unless your front row is going forward if your front row is going nowhere after a few phases and then you give it to the backs they can’t really do anything because they don’t have momentum in front of them we saw this in game 3 of RGR and in game 4 where the AB back line didn’t have much impact

Les Kiss needs to pick his best front row so then the wallabies can push through the middle and then give it to the backs to make space

u
unknown 25 days ago

I reckon the forwards need to be direct but backs need to chuck it around like you say. 10 is going to be a worry….

R
RC 25 days ago

Wallabies will win.

P
PM 24 days ago

You may well be correct

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close