Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Wallabies - Player ratings

Michael Hooper and Kurtley Beale

The Wallabies good recent run of form came to an end at a very dreary Twickenham. In a game littered with errors England coped better with the conditions and ran away with the game at the end winning 30-6, taking their points when they could. Here is how the players rated:

ADVERTISEMENT

Scott Sio 7 Would have been targeted at scrum time but was very solid in the set piece.

Tatafu Polota-Nau 6 Lineout didn’t function as well as it has in recent weeks.

Sekope Kepu 7 Solid at scrum time with Sio and more prominent in the loose this week.

Rob Simmons 6 Decent enough 80 minutes without doing too much.

Blake Enever 5 Struggled with pace of the game, didn’t show much in the loose.

Ned Hannigan 6 Busy again went off injured at half time.

Michael Hooper 6 Try disallowed in first half, usual work rate, sin binned for second week in a row.

Sean McMahon 8 Very solid defensively, won penalties at the breakdown, strong with all in hand.

ADVERTISEMENT

Will Genia 7 Not as influential as last week but very calm at the base.

Bernard Foley 6 Decent game from the fly half, didn’t get his back line going forward as much as he would have wanted.

Reece Hodge 6 Another quiet display from Hodge, good long range penalty but didn’t see much of the ball.

Samu Kerevi 6 Great break in the second half and worried the defence at times. Still too easy to defend against at international level.

Tevita Kuridrani 6 Another good performance, always willing to get on the ball. Great kick through nearly led to a try in first half, bombed a try after fine work from Kerevi.

ADVERTISEMENT

Marika Koroibete 8 Should have scored in first half but mis-controlled the ball on his foot, superb defensively superb line from inside ball from Beale unlucky not to score.

Kurtley Beale 4 Sin binned in the first half and at fault for Daly’s try.

Subs – 6 unless stated

Stephen Moore

Tom Robertson

Allan Alaalatoa

Mat Phillip

Ben McCalman

Nick Phipps – DNP

Karmichael Hunt

Henry Speight – DNP

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

284 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT