Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

What the Wallabies can take away from Ireland series

By Robert Seltzer

With the World Cup just one year away, Australia’s series with Ireland was a vital series for Michael Cheika to take stock and have a look at the players that he may have at his disposal come next year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ireland have had a superb year and are currently ranked number two in the world. The combined score over the three tests was a 55-55 draw showing how close it was and giving Cheika a lot of positives to take out of the series. In saying that, there are also a couple of areas that need to be improved and looked at for the Wallabies to be serious contenders at the big dance.

Here are a few things that Cheika would have learnt:

1 – This one is more of a reminder, but what a player David Pocock is. Having taken a sabbatical away from rugby he slipped back in seamlessly and was the man of the series. His work at the breakdown was immense, consistently disrupting the Irish ball and making a nuisance of himself. He is an indispensable player that simply has to be in the team for Australia to be really competitive.

2
Taniela Tupou is the future. Sekope Kepu’s days may well be numbered. Every time Tupou came on he made an impact in both the scrum and the loose. A dynamic and powerful ball runner, he is always looking for work and takes some stopping. His raw strength and power make him a weapon at scrum time and one that Ireland struggled to deal with even with their star-studded front row of Furlong, McGrath and Healy.

The one thing that may be in Kepu’s favour, other than his experience, is the fact that Tupou is so dynamic off the bench offering something and Kepu simply doesn’t offer the same threat.

3
Will Genia is almost as important to the team as Pocock. When he was injured in the second test his absence was noticeable. His control of the game is superb and his pass is a lot better than the current back up Nick Phipps.

This will be an area of concern for Cheika. Tournament rugby is notoriously tough with games coming thick and fast and there being such a big difference in first and second choice scrumhalf will need to be addressed.

4
– Lukhan Tui and Pete Samu offer a good foil to Hooper and Pocock. Whilst Hooper and Pocock’s game is disruptive and with ball in hand they tend to link the play more, Tui and Samu are power back rowers. This is something Australia has needed for a while.

With George Smith there was Toutai Kefu and Wycliff Palu providing the power. David Lyons had that about his game but there has been a dearth of that in the squad. If Tui’s run on debut was anything to go by and he continues to develop then they may have just found that balance.

Video Spacer

5 – The hooker position is still really up for grabs. Brandon Paenga-Amosa started the three tests but Tolu Latu did himself no harm with his performances. The problem both have is their set piece. Their lineout work can be erratic and with Adam Coleman packing down they have a great lineout option, so no excuses.

ADVERTISEMENT

Both players like ball in hand and Latu’s defence is fierce but they need to make sure that their bread and butter is sorted. Whilst
both are good players, neither can currently be considered world class and this could be an area other teams target.

6 – Cheika seems to have found his preferred back line. The starting backs were only changed due to injury to Genia, with Kurtley Beale at 12 and Samu Kerevi at 13 his centre pairing of choice. Kerevi doesn’t seem to be able to transfer is Super Rugby form to the International stage on a regular basis.

He has all the tools to be a great 13 and foil to Beale but he needs to perform on a regular basis.

7 – Another position with a glaring lack of depth is 10. Bernard Foley is the incumbent but below him there isn’t a whole lot. Quade Cooper seems to be persona non-grata now. Reece Hodge shapes as the backup but 10 it isn’t his preferred position. Foley himself runs hot and cold, with strike players such as Israel Folau and Marika Koroibete out wide giving them time and space would be devastating for opposition, something that doesn’t happen often enough.

ADVERTISEMENT

8 – As mentioned, a lot of young talent has been given valuable game time against a top team.

This can only bode well for the future and with the Rugby Championship on the horizon, it will give the coaching team more time to
coach and evaluate these players as they start to form the skeleton of their World Cup squad.

In other news:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 1 hours ago
All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’

Sabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.

1 Go to comments
M
Mzilikazi 4 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Had hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”

11 Go to comments
S
Sam T 10 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

9 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Hurricanes make 10 changes in starting XV for Drua Hurricanes make 10 changes for Drua
Search