VIDEO: Footage suggests Sonny Bill's red card hit more unlucky than malevolent
The events of the second test in Wellington on Saturday provided endless talking points. Opinions vary, and the facts seem to be defined by where you’re from, who you support, or who you’re talking to. One thing we all know for sure though, is that the camera hides no-one. So instead of letting our eyes deceive us, let’s take a look through the lens.
First up in our video, in it’s own unavoidable fashion, is the Sonny Bill Williams incident. Played first at full speed it can be hard to spot amidst all that’s going on. If we look at the clip slowed down to half and then quarter speed, and from better angles, you’ll see two lines appear.
The yellow line represents the line below which Williams must hit Watson in order for it to be legal. Then the orange line, represents the same area, but after Watson drops his head.
We clock the time it takes Anthony Watson’s body to fall at 0.8 seconds. Meaning that in real time, Williams has only 0.4 seconds to react, change his body angle, and move his shoulder to hit him legally.
Looking again however, even if Watson’s head did not drop, Williams would have collided with him right on the yellow line, where it would have been legal, but a huge hit.
Another point to note is Williams’ clenched right fist. Nobody approaches a tackle with both the intention to wrap both their arms, and a closed fist. Especially given his background in rugby league, it’s a sign he’s looking for the impact some players crave.
In our final angle, it’s clear from his body shape that Williams approaches the tackle hoping to join Naholo and attempt to hold the ball up. However, he has no time to react to a falling Watson. As a result, his intention to make a hit is carried through, but his attempt to hold the ball up is not.
Is it a red card? Absolutely. Does Williams go out looking for a big hit? Yes, but what players don’t these days? Does Williams intent to make contact with the head? Almost certainly not. Severity, rashness and danger, all the ingredients for a red card are certainly there, whether they’re intended or not.
Next we look at the other man ordered off the field, Mako Vunipola, and his yellow. It differs from the red car not only in colour, but also in motive.
We found earlier that Sonny Bill Williams had little to no time to react before hitting Anthony Watson. In contrast, the first time Vunipola hits Barrett, he has two strides and roughly three metres.
As Barrett kicks, Vunipola’s eyes are never on the ball. Exactly three minutes later, he again has eyes only for Barrett.
This time he completely bypasses the tackled Sean O’Brien and makes a line for the terrified All Black playmaker, rather than protecting the ball as he should. Captain Warburton argues that Barrett is in the wrong side, which he isn’t, as he’s the tackler, but it’s irrelevant.
Barrett presents no imminent threat to the Lions keeping the ball, but he does threaten when the All Blacks have it.
Vunipola is unlike Williams in that he isn’t sent off for the severity of his play, but for the fact he looks to have a clear intent to hurt his opposition. It’s not uncommon to target a number ten, just ask Jonny Sexton, but making it as obvious as Vunipola did makes it cardable.
While Vunipola may have been sent off for his part in it, overall the Lions were hugely successful in their mission to alter the All Blacks’ game. The slowed the kiwis down and limited their options, and it was at it’s most evident in their ruck intensity.
The Lions were everywhere, led by Sam Warburton, who can’t be praised enough for his tenacity at the breakdown. Our examples are only some of many that show the Lions playing right on the edge of the rules.
With Beauden Barrett leaving his kicking boots at home they could afford to trade their penalty count for the All Blacks’ speed. This meant tactically they were rarely threatened out wide, and could control forward play with a man advantage.
Of course, by adopting a bend not break attitude in terms of penalties, some holes were exposed in the Lions defense. Their rush defensive line was helped hugely by the slow ruck ball, but when it was tested with quick passing it looked to creak from time to time.
We saw the ball kicked in behind twice by the All Blacks, both inside the Lions 22. The first is clearly a set move with Read ready to run, and both seem to be part of a plan.
By rushing up so fast, the Lions left space in behind, and when in their 22, this space isn’t covered by a full back. Meaning they relied on the speed and awareness of Watson and Daly on the wings to keep Kieran Read inches from two tries.
The Lions had well thought out tries of their own. The first displays some great passing to convert on the fact they had finally stretched the depleted All Blacks wide. A scrambling Israel Dagg was no match for a thundering Faletau, and the Lions do well to create that situation.
The second try is a perfectly executed move. The lions turn convention on its head and give the All Blacks a taste of their own style, sending a speedy hooker through a gap. Then defy the norm again at ruck time.
There’s no denying that when you see the 9, the 10 and the 12 all in the same ruck, it’s no accident. Farrell and Sexton combine to form a high speed back row while the loose forwards have been left behind by the previous play. They both hold off All Blacks to give Conor Murray a gap to dart over the line and finish off a fantastic multi phase set play.
The Lions planned and executed that try perfectly – just as they did the entire game. Of course they wouldn’t have planned on the All Blacks shooting themselves in the foot, and if Steve Hansen and his men have anything to say about it, things will be different this week.
That being said, a red card and wayward kicks at goal are mistakes, and the team that makes the least mistakes, wins the game.
Comments on RugbyPass
Exciting place to be for the young fella. I expected he was French Polynesian when I saw him included in the France 6N squad (after seeing him in NZs), and therefor be strong grounds we might loose him to rugby down here. Good, in that he is good enough to warrant such a profile, and from a journalism’s fan interaction aspect, to finally get a back ground story on the fella. Hope he has settled into NZ OK and that at least one rugby country will fit with him to help his development, which, if so, he should surely continue for a few years, and then that he can experience France to it’s fullest with a bit more maturity and less reliance on family than you would have at his current age. A good 3 or 4 years before he would be ready for International duty if he wanted to wait. Of course he already sounds good enough to accept a call up, and to cap himself, in the more immediate future (he’d have to be very very good in the case of the ABs), and he’ll get a great taste of that being with the Canes who have a bunch who are just a few years further into their career and looking likely Internationals themselves.
11 Go to commentsI remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.
3 Go to commentsOh wow… “But as La Rochelle proved in winning in Cape Town this season, a cross-continental away assignment need not spell the end of days.” La Rochelle actually proved quite the opposite. After traveling to Cape town and back they (back-to-back and current champs) got mercilessly thumped the next week. If travel is not the reason, why else would a full-strength powerhouse like La Rochelle get dumped on their @r$e$ one week later?
26 Go to commentsYou know he can land a winning conversion after the full time siren is up. (Even if it takes two attempts.)
5 Go to commentsA very insightful article from Jake. I would love to know how South African’s feel about their move to Europe. Do you prefer playing in Europe or want to go back to Super Rugby?
3 Go to commentspure fire
1 Go to commentsA very well thought out summary of all the relevant complications…agree with your ”refer the Cricket Test versus 20/20 comparison”. More also definitely doesn't necessarily mean better!
3 Go to commentsMust be something when you are only 19 y.o and both NZ and France want you. Btw he wasn’t the only new caledonian in french U20 as Robin Couly also lived in Noumea until 17. Hope he’s successful wherever he chooses to play.
11 Go to comments“Several key players in the Stade Rochelais squad are in their thirties” South Africans are going to hate the implications of that comment!
5 Go to commentsI know Leinster did a job on La Roche but shortly after HT Leinster were 30-13 ahead of them and at a similar time Toulouse were trailing Exeter. At 60 mins Leinster were 27 ahead but after 67 mins Toulouse were only 19 ahead before Exeter collapsed. That’s heavier scoring by Leinster against the Champions. I think people are looking at Toulouses total a little too much. I also think Northhampton are in with a real chance, albeit I’d put Leinster as favourites. If Leinster make the final I expect them to win by more than ten and with control.
5 Go to commentsHey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂
5 Go to commentsNot sure exactly what went wrong for him at Glasgow but it’s pretty clear he ain’t Franco’s cup of tea. Suspect he would have been better served heading out of Scotland around the same time as Finn, Hoggy and Jonny!
1 Go to commentsBulls disrespected the Northampton supporters and the competition. Decide quickly, fully in or out.
26 Go to commentsI wonder if Parling was ever on England’s radar as a coach? Obviously Borthwick is a great lineout coach, but I do worry he might be taking on too much as both head coach and forwards coach.
1 Go to commentsJason Jenkins has one cap. When Etzebeth was his age he had over 80 caps. Experience matters. He will never amount to what Etzebeth has because he hasn’t been developed as an international player.
2 Go to commentsSays much about the player picking this gig over the easier and bigger rewards offered to him in Japan. Also says a lot about the state sanctioned tax benefits the Irish Revenue offers pro rugby players, with their ten highest earning years subject to an additional 40% tax relief and paid as a lump sum, in cash, at retirement. Certainly helps Leinster line up the financial ducks in a row to fund marquee signings like this!!! No other union anywhere in world rugby benefits from this kind of lucrative financial sponsorship from their government…
5 Go to commentsTrue Jordie could earn a lot more in Japan. But by choosing Leinster he’ll be playing with 1 of the best clubs in the world and can win a champions cup and URC…..
6 Go to commentsThanks for that Marshy, noticed you didn't say who is gonna win it. We know who ain't gonna win it - your Crusaders outfit. They've gone from having arguably the best Super Rugby first five ever, to having a clutch of rookies. Hurricanes all the way!
1 Go to commentsGeez you really have to question the NRLs ability to produce players of quality. Its pathetic. Dont the 25mil in Aus produce enough quality womens players. Sad.
1 Go to commentsBulls fan here, and agree 100% with the conclusion (and little else) of this article. SA sides should absolutely f-off from the champs cup until we get fair scheduling, equal support for travel arrangements and home semis. You know, like all the european teams get.
26 Go to comments