Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Uproar as Farrell appears to get away with yet another shoulder charge

By Ian Cameron
Owen Farrell's tackling technique has come in for criticism yet again.

Owen Farrell’s problematic tackling technique and the apparent unwillingness of rugby authorities to take him to task over his shoulder charges are in the spotlight once again.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Saracens playmaker only received a penalty after making contact with the neck area of Worcester’s Tom Howe in his side’s one-sided 62 – 5 thrashing of Worcester Warriors.

It is the latest in a long line of questionable decision around Farrell’s tackling.

The contact was referred to referee Craig Maxwell-Keys who ruled after viewing the TMO footage that Farrell had started low and risen up, giving rise to “mitigating circumstances”.

To make matters worse, Worcester lock Anton Bresler was sin-binned just minutes later for an apparent dangerous clear-out on Mako Vunipola. The Saracens prop was floored from the incident and Bresler was given his marching orders.

Many online were left questioning how Farrell appeared to yet again evade ay significant sanction, despite his shoulder making contact with the head and neck area of a player and with no obvious wrapping of the arms.

Rugby legal expert and concussion advocate Tim O’Connor tweeted: “And then you notice that what you see by the tackled player’s head is not a royal-blue hoarding but the black jersey on Farrell’s shoulder.”

ADVERTISEMENT

https://twitter.com/timoconnorbl/status/1213529566305800192
https://twitter.com/ScottBaileys/status/1213515980946706432
https://twitter.com/joshgardner/status/1213520708250349569
https://twitter.com/DarrenBirch68/status/1213488877052289024
https://twitter.com/ianapharri/status/1213523284333076481
https://twitter.com/VikkiSquires19/status/1213524722039894019
https://twitter.com/slattsmachine/status/1213516033551671299
https://twitter.com/ryandevlin123/status/1213535427510059008
https://twitter.com/ianalex86/status/1213549397486772224

Others however defended the decision not to card the England star.

https://twitter.com/joesummer100/status/1213533189576298496

Farrell’s tackling was far from Saracens DoR Mark McCall mind after the game.  McCall admitted the setback at Sandy Park the previous week had hurt the club as they continue their desperate battle against relegation.

ADVERTISEMENT

“When we looked at the Exeter performance properly, it was really frustrating to see our lack of intensity at crucial points,” McCall said.

“We were outworked by Exeter so fair play to them for that, but it’s something we don’t want to happen.

“We want to play with intensity and properly work hard and as we saw here that gives you a lot of good things in rugby. We enjoyed it and we want to enjoy our rugby.

“We did that in the first 30 minutes and got a lot of rewards. The second half was very disjointed because of all the injuries.”

RugbyPass/additional reporting PA

One of Welsh Rugby’s biggest characters on and off the pitch, RugbyPass travelled to Brecon to see how life after rugby is treating Andy Powell.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 2 hours ago
All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’

Sabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.

2 Go to comments
M
Mzilikazi 6 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Had hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”

11 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle
Search