Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Underhill must get 'smarter' - Neil Back

By Ian Cameron
Sam Underhill

Former England openside Neil Back believes England’s backrow play needs to improve if England are to beat the best sides in the world.

ADVERTISEMENT

What’s more, Back believes that the heir apparent to England’s openside – Sam Underhill – needs to be ‘smarter’ in the contact zone to develop his game.

“England’s game has developed since 2015. Yes, Eddie was picking the ‘6.5’ type players, but that’s the way the game was being played in the Premiership,” Back told RugbyPass.

“Since the World Cup, there has been a drive to develop an attacking philosophy. It was clear that Southern Hemisphere had the edge in that area at the World Cup. Their domestic game translates better into the international scene.

“You have to remember that it’s not the England coach’s job to tell Premiership teams how to play rugby.”

A World Cup winner in 2003, the 49-year-old believes England’s backrowers need to rediscover the somewhat lost art of link play and try to create for players around them, as opposed to soley carrying or making big defensive hits.

Back – an openside specialist – believes Sam Underhill is a case in point.

“Of course he’s got to concentrate on the perfecting his tackle technique but he has to get smarter too. You see him looking to make big hits, but that can take you off your feet.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If you’re off your feet you’re out of the game. Intelligence in the tackle area is vital – getting over the ball quickly. You need to stay in motion and stay in the game.

“Billy Vunipola carries really well but you also see him putting other players into space, and getting the ball out of contact. If you look at the Southern Hemisphere in terms of speed of ball at contact, one out three times it’s fast-ball. In the Northern Hemisphere it’s probably about one in five.”

Back believes England’s link play needs to improve further to beat elite sides.

“The forwards need to get more comfortable with ball-in-hand. Our front five are good carriers, but the best defences can stop them.”

Back played the bulk of his career at around 92kg, a modest amount by modern standards where backrows under 100kg are scarce. He believes that while “height, weight and how much you can lift in the gym” are important metrics, they are not the be all and end all.

“I played between 88kg at my lightest and 95kg. Even when I was 95kg of lean body mass, I felt I was too heavy. My fighting weight was about 92-93kg.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s about maximising the physical potential of an individual,” says Back. “No coach ever told me I was too small. My point of difference was that I was pound-for-pound one of the most powerful players in my position and I was a consistent performer.

“If that meant me getting over the ball, clearing a ruck, getting an offload away or putting a bigger player into space to make a carry, that’s what I did.

“If you’re good enough, you’re big enough. I worked my hind legs off and I never left thinking ‘What if?’.”

Back’s career spanned eight years as an amateur player and nine years as a professional, and is well placed to see how the game has gone. Asked whether if he started playing rugby now would he have become an international backrow, his answer comes without hesitation.

“100 per cent I’d be playing for England. I’ll always back myself.”

Join World Cup 2003 heroes Neil Back, Will Greenwood and Mike Tindall at the all-new Wolf Run obstacle race in East Sussex on 28th April. Get your pack together with the buy four get one free offer – www.thewolfrun.com

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Sam T 3 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

3 Go to comments
E
Ed the Duck 10 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Hey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂

5 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Ryan Baird has unlocked raw power for Leinster and Ireland Ryan Baird has unlocked raw power for Leinster and Ireland
Search