Ulster are paying a heavy price at the turnstile for their nightmarish year off the pitch
Ravenhill wasn’t bursting at the seams when Ulster swooped for their latest Champions Cup win on Friday night. A little over 12,000 people paid in, a third of the 18,000-capacity ground left empty. So much for partisan war-cry of standing up en masse for their beloved Ulstermen.
You can be taken in by some excuses as to why supporters voted with their feet. The weather was bad. The match was taking place on a night busy with Belfast office Christmas parties.
Truth be told, though, the disappointing attendance was further evidence that Ulster are paying a heavy price for the brand-damaging, haphazard way they conducted business in early 2018. Players and coaches were sacked. The CEO repeatedly ran for cover without sufficiently fronting up. Terrible optics that left a legacy which is now hitting the club in the pocket.
Results-wise, there is little difference between how current boss Dan McFarland is faring compared to last winter under the ousted Les Kiss. McFarland has nine wins and a draw from 14 outings. Kiss had 10 wins and a draw from the same number of matches. All much of a muchness on the pitch then.
Off the pitch, however, it’s a different story. Turnstile evidence of a province disconnected from its paying public. Their first seven home games under Kiss in 2017/18 attracted 102,382 people. Their first seven at home under McFarland? Just 88,227 have turned up, 14,155 down.
Continue reading below…
It’s a costly 14 percent drop-off. With average ticket prices in Belfast around £29.50 (price range is £14 to £45), Ulster’s gate revenue has potentially collapsed by as much as £400,000. Enough of a wedge to fund the annual salary of two-and-a-half first-team players.
Excuses can be made why their cumulative PRO14 attendance is 8,474 below what it was at this stage of the season a year ago, a troubling 1,254 people less attending this October’s home derby with Connacht compared to the same fixture 12 months earlier.
However, something must be fundamentally wrong when gates for the European home matches against Leicester and Scarlets attracted 5,661 people less than last winter’s Champions Cup games versus Wasps and Harlequins. Similar standard UK opposition, but fewer people cheering them along.
What gives? It’s obvious their reputation remains dented by last spring’s various going-ons. They were sloppy in managing the damaging fall-out of the unprecedented Paddy Jackson/Stuart Olding court case.
Sloppy, too, in their coaching ticket reshuffle. Kiss was sacked without proper explanation when it happened. Jono Gibbes quit, claiming he wanted to go home to New Zealand only to caught negotiating a job he went on to take in France. Then McFarland was appointed but not cleanly appointed as he initially was only being released by Scotland for the start of 2019 before compromise was reached.
All the while, CEO Shane Logan, who ambitiously stated at the start of his reign in 2010 that his plan was to make Ulster the world’s leading rugby club, failed to illustrate strong leadership to dilute the crisis. The administrator eventually fell on his sword at the end of a season where Irish legend Brian O’Driscoll trenchantly described them as a ‘basket-case’ province.
Not that it has all been doom and gloom for a business that became the most talked about in Ireland for all the wrong reasons in early 2018.
McFarland’s fresh approach ensured terrible inter-pro defeats to Munster and Connacht didn’t have a lingering on-field hangover. Meanwhile, long-serving sponsor Kingspan remained onside, the building products manufacturer extending through to 2023 as the club’s principle sponsor.
But there continues to be a troubling state of flux regarding what Ulster aspire to be. They want to showcase the best local rugby talent, yet local identity continues to decline.
When they last lifted a trophy, beating Ospreys in Swansea to clinch Celtic League honours in May 2006, 12 of their starting 15 had taken up the game locally, 18 from 22 when you added in the bench selection.
Come the 2012 European Cup final, local input had reduced to eight of the starting line-up at Twickenham against Leinster. The half-dozen more locals on the bench made it a 14 from 23 figure.
Six-and-a-half years later, though, Ulster’s increasing inability to foster their own was illustrated by the origin of the personnel that brushed aside Scarlets in European round four. Just eight of the 23 – a mere four of the starting 15 – were locals. Contrast that to high-flying Leinster, who gave Bath a trouncing with 20 of their 23 growing up in their province.
The lack of identity grates. Former coach Brian McLaughlin, unceremoniously dumped as team boss following the 2012 European final, cites failings at grassroots level for the shortfall. He believes the funding of more Ulster-employed coaches and development officers is needed to combat constraints on teachers in the schools rugby system and the growth in popularity of the Northern Ireland soccer side.
This battle for hearts and minds shouldn’t be so difficult. In Rory Best, Ulster have the current Ireland skipper on their books. In Jacob Stockdale, they possess one of the most exciting talents to emerge anywhere in the world in recent years. His Friday night finish against Scarlets was sublime, enabling Ulster retake a lead they never lost.
What the club badly needs is a period of stability. One CEO, two directors of rugby, four head coaches and multiple assistants have moved on since that cup final appearance in London 79 months ago. That’s quite an upheaval, a merry-go-round that will have McFarland fearing he will become another casualty unless he is given the right level of support to evolve his fledgling reign.
Putting the Ulster back into Ulster and winning back the approval of stay-away fans is an immense challenge in a climate where they are dismissively described as Leinster Lite, a squad with a growing chunk of players who learned their trade in Dublin, not in or around the Belfast area.
Iain Henderson admitted a year ago they were trying to take remedial steps, a culture committee being formed to enhance the local knowledge of Ulster’s imports.
‘Once or twice a month we get past players coming in for a chat, so the lads get a feel for what it means for local players and what it meant for them to play for Ulster and how proud they were wearing a white jersey, building all that around our club ethos, trying to work hard for each other and being more of a team rather than being a collection of players,’ he explained.
‘We’re quite proud of our values and what we have got in terms of our fanbase, the facilities we have got, but also the history behind the club.’
That history became tainted by the stressful months which followed, but three wins from four has given them a chance of European progress for the first time since 2014. Qualification would surely help win back some lost support, but it’s easier said than done. Kiss went into Christmas last year with three wins from four, but failed to get Ulster into the last eight.
The pressure will be on rookie boss McFarland to ensure his similarly good approach work doesn’t go to waste in January.
Comments on RugbyPass
harry potter is set in stone. he creates stability and finishes well. exactly what schmidt likes. he’s the ben smith of australian rugby. i think it could quite easily be potter toole and kellaway for the foreseeable future.
5 Go to commentsThis is short sighted from Clayton if you ask me, smacks of too much preseason planning and no adaptability. What if DMac is out for a must win match, are they still only going to bring their best first five and playmaker on late in the game? Trusting the game to someone who wasn’t even part of planning (they would have had Trask pinned in as Jacomb preseason). Perhaps if the Crusaders were better they would not have done this, but either way imo you take this opportunity to play a guy you might need starting in a final rather than having their 12th game getting comfortable coming off the bench.
1 Go to commentsThanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.
21 Go to commentsWhat a load of bollocks. The author has forgotten to mention the fact that the Crusaders have a huge injury toll with top world class players out. Not to mention the fact that they are obviously in a transition period. No this will not spark a slow death for NZ rugby, but it does mean there will be a new Super Rugby champion. Anyone who knows anything about NZ rugby knows that there is some serious talent here, it just isn’t all at the Crusaders.
2 Go to commentsI wouldn’t spend the time on Nawaqanitawase! No point in having him filling in a jersey when he’s committed to leave Union. Give the jersey to a young prospect who will be here in the future.
5 Go to commentsIt was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
7 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to commentsOf the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.
29 Go to commentsIrish Rugby CEO be texting Andy Farrell “Andy, i found our next Kiwi Irishman”
5 Go to commentsI certainly don’t miss drinking beers at 8am in the morning watching rugby games being played in NZ.
1 Go to commentsThis looks like a damage limitation exercise for Wales, keeping back some of their more effective players for the last 20/25 minutes to try and counter England’s fresh legs so the Red Roses don’t rack up a big score.
1 Go to commentsVery unlikely the Bulls will beat Leinster in Dublin. It would be different in Pretoria.
1 Go to commentsI think it is a dangerous path to go down to ban a player for the same period that a player they injured takes to recover. Players would be afraid to tackle anyone. I once tackled my best friend at school in a practice match and sprained his ankle. I paid for it by having to play fly-half instead of full-back for the rest of that season’s fixtures.
5 Go to commentsJust such a genuine good bloke…and probably the best all round player in his generation. Good guys do come first sometimes and he handled the W.Cup loss with great attitude.
2 Go to commentsWord in France is that he’s on the radar of a few Top14 clubs.
5 Go to commentsGet blocking Travis, this guy has styles and he’s gonna make a swift impact…!
1 Go to commentsWhat remorse? She claimed that her dangerous tackle wasn’t worthy of a red! She should be compensating the injured player for loss of earnings at the minimum. Her ban should include the recovery time of the injured player as well as the paltry 3 match ban.
5 Go to comments