Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Track athlete filmed taking out Beauden Barrett's Bronco fitness test record

Beauden Barrett and Richie Mo'unga weren't overly impressed after the All Blacks' draw with the Springboks in Wellington. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

NZ Herald: Beauden Barrett made headlines last month after setting a fitness record at the Blues before even playing a game of rugby – but how will an actual track athlete fare in the grueling ‘Bronco’ test?

ADVERTISEMENT

The Bronco is a fitness test used in rugby where players run shuttles of 20 metres, 40 metres, and 60 metres, five times over as quickly as they can.

Barrett ran the 1.2km drill in 4min 12sec, recording a personal best and setting a Blues record.

NZME’s Coast took the Bronco challenge to teen sensation and Olympic hopeful Sam Tanner, who usually competes in the 1500m.

Thanks to his training as a middle distance runner, the 19-year-old predictably smashed Barrett’s record with a time of 4min 1sec.

However, Tanner said it wasn’t easy and explained how it differed from his usual running.

“In the normal track, you’re not having to stop and start like that,” Tanner said. “Sometimes there’s a change of pace but it’s not that intense.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Tanner, who holds the national U-19 record for the 1500m, said it was a “good feeling” to beat Barrett’s time by more 11 seconds.

This article first appeared in the New Zealand Herald and republished here with permission.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 7 minutes ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

The main problem is that on this thread we are trying to fit a round peg into a square hole. Rugby union developed as distinct from rugby league. The difference - rugby league opted for guaranteed tackle ball and continuous phase play. Rugby union was based on a stop start game with stanzas of flowing exciting moves by smaller faster players bookended by forward tussles for possession between bigger players. The obsession with continuous play has brought the hybrid (long before the current use) into play. Backs started to look more like forwards because they were expected to compete at the tackle and breakdowns completely different from what the original game looked like. Now here’s the dilemma. Scrum lineout ruck and maul, tackling kicking handling the ball. The seven pillars of rugby union. We want to retain our “World in Union” essence with the strong forward influence on the game but now we expect 125kg props to scrum like tractors and run around like scrum halves. And that in a nutshell is the problem. While you expect huge scrums and ball in play time to be both yardsticks, you are going to have to have big benches. You simply can’t have it both ways. And BTW talking about player safety when I was 19 I was playing at Stellenbosch at a then respectable (for a fly half) 160lbs against guys ( especially in Koshuis rugby) who were 100 lbs heavier than me - and I played 80 minutes. You just learned to stay out of their way. In Today’s game there is no such thing and not defending your channel is a cardinal sin no matter how unequal the task. When we hybridised with union in semi guaranteed tackle ball the writing was on the wall.

190 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT