Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

The stunning transformation of George Ford

By Ben Smith
The stunning transformation of George Ford

Two weeks ago, Leicester dished up one of the worst opening performances in recent memory, leading to the sacking of head coach Matt O’Connor.

ADVERTISEMENT

Since that decision the Tigers have rebounded emphatically, blitzing Newcastle in the first half in their home opener at Welford Road and piling 35 points on at the Ricoh despite being down to 14-men for most of the match.

Worries of a dead cat bounce look to be misguided after the follow-up 6-point loss to Wasps, as the schizophrenic Tigers have transformed into a dangerous attacking side and one man at the centre of this is flyhalf George Ford.

He is playing like the weight has been lifted off his shoulders, without the fear of repercussions, ripping teams apart with guile and daring bravado.

You can’t go from being that bad to this good overnight. There is only one explanation for this, and it is a sad indictment on O’Connor – he is a coach who gets the worst out of his players, and that is the worst kind of coach.

Video Spacer

When a coach is at odds with his team, restraining their natural talents and failing to find a way for their skills to flourish, the conflict permeates into performance. Ford’s aimless and meandering play under O’Connor’s direction has disappeared overnight, replaced by an attacking genius looking to tear teams apart with ball-in-hand.

The shackles have been removed and we are seeing the best of George Ford – 5 line breaks, 12 defenders beaten, three try assists and one try for himself in just two games. That doesn’t include the involvement in the lead-up work to many other Tiger tries.

ADVERTISEMENT

It can be impossible from the outside to know how the players are feeling about their coach, or how their relationship with the coach is impacting their play. But in this case, the evidence is overwhelming. There has been no change except for the removal of Matt O’Connor and Ford is now, statistically, the best attacking 10 in the competition.

The Tigers have opened up the playbook, looking to run from their own 22 at times, testing the defence before exiting. They are actually gelling from set-piece attack and in phase play, and Ford’s play has been instrumental in all of this.

It might seem harsh on O’Connor, but this is a coach who has been sacked or let go from the last three teams he’s been at, with the same issues persisting at each stop over the last five years. The modern game is evolving at such rapid pace as rule changes bring about new strategies, every four years is like a decade in rugby years. When coaches are employed based on successes from the late 2000’s or even early 2010’s, it can be like still using a Nokia flip phone when the iPhone is here. Unless they have evolved as well it is a recipe for disaster.

Why teams continue to hand out contracts to old relics is a mystery, and now after O’Connor’s third failed stint in a row, this should surely be the end until he proves himself in lower grades. He should be on every club’s blacklist until that happens, unless they want to nosedive fast.

ADVERTISEMENT

One man can make all the difference, which is why O’Connor had to go – without him Leicester, and George Ford, are far better off.

In other news:

Video Spacer

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 3 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

Of the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.

29 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Juan Ignacio Brex: 'Italy made history, but it's not enough' Juan Ignacio Brex: 'Italy made history, but it's not enough'
Search