Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

That was useless - Barclay laments Scotland's Twickenham horror show

Scotland captain John Barclay

A dismayed John Barclay described Scotland’s performance in their 61-21 trouncing at the hands of England as “useless”.

Scotland came into Saturday’s meeting at Twickenham knowing a win would put them in the driving seat for a maiden Six Nations crown.

But Vern Cotter’s men were blown away by the defending champions, who took advantage of Scotland’s injury-ravaged back-line to run in seven tries en route to a thumping Calcutta Cup triumph.

The heavy defeat means Scotland sit fifth in the table, but are only a point behind second-placed Ireland ahead of hosting rock-bottom Italy at Murrayfield in their final fixture next weekend.

“I don’t know what to say to be honest. We didn’t show up,” Barclay, who has been standing in as captain for the injured Greig Laidlaw, told ITV Sport.

“We got off to a bad start and it continued, our discipline was very poor and we conceded soft tries.

“England are a very good side, arguably the best in the world so fair play to them but we’re very disappointed obviously.

“It’s easy to look at that [injuries] as an excuse but we train for those scenarios. We believe in our squad so we’ll look at the review but it won’t be good watching.

“There always has been [fight in the side], we’re trying to move away from the tag of plucky losers but that wasn’t even plucky, that was useless.

“We’ve got one week left and we can finish the championship with three from five but if we play like that we’ve got no chance.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

286 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT