Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Super Rugby draft concept receives more support from key personnel

By Ned Lester
(Photo by Michael Bradley/Getty Images)

Evenly distributing the best young talent from across Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific is a surefire way to promote a competitive landscape across Super Rugby Pacific, and the draft concept that could facilitate that is gaining traction.

ADVERTISEMENT

This week Rugby Australia welcomed new Chief Executive Phil Waugh and the former Wallaby was quick to express his ambitions when it comes to the Australian rugby teams’ success against their Oceanian competition. Waugh vowed to discuss the Super Rugby draft idea with his New Zealand Rugby counterpart Mark Robinson.

The head honchos are one piece of the puzzle required to get the idea over the line, the Players’ Associations are another. New Zealand Rugby Player Association’s CEO Rob Nichol this week also threw his support behind the idea, while noting some conditions that would be required for an official sign-off.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“We never say no to opportunities,” Nichol told Stuff. “Something I think that can be really attractive is a prospect of a draft which is around New Zealand talent, Australian talent and Pacific talent.

“New Zealand, Australia, and the Pacific now through Moana Pasifika, we’re joined at the hip to retain professional rugby in this part of the world.

“I don’t think people really understand that. We’re competing in the global marketplace, which is becoming incredibly aggressive with private equity interests becoming very influential in the northern hemisphere.

“We’ve got to be innovative. We’ve got to say, ‘How can we all work together to not just retain but actually attract talent back to this part of the world?’

“We want to strengthen all of the teams, and we want to provide pathways for our professional players or aspiring professional players to be able to get out there and express their talent.”

Related

There would still be room for clubs to retain homegrown talent that they have invested in throughout their development pathways. The draft would aim to better align players with situations that offer on-field opportunities.

A prerequisite for the draft to get the green light would be an appropriate amendment to national team eligibility laws. If young athletes are to be evenly distributed across the Super Rugby clubs, they should not be restricted from representing their country of birth due to them belonging to an offshore club.

“I think it becomes really important,” Nichol continued. “It might not be super important for the young 19, 20, 21-year-old who’s looking to get a one or two-year break, but it becomes incredibly important when they get into a Super Rugby environment, they’re starting to find form, and then they start thinking about the next step.

“It’s always a conversation that we’re having…the logical [answer] is that as long as you play in a competition that New Zealand [Rugby] is an owner in, what about that?

“In other words, if you play in Super Rugby Pacific, could you be eligible for the All Blacks? That to me, if there was to be a change, that’s probably the logical change to go to.”

“It’s not about forcing people or exerting some form of ownership over them.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Pieter-Steph du Toit, The Malmesbury Missile, in conversation with Big Jim

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 2 hours ago
Why European rugby is in danger of death-by-monopoly

While all this is going on… I’ve been thinking more about the NFL draft system and how to make the commercial elements of the game more sustainable for SA teams who precariously live on the fringe of these developments. SA teams play in Europe now, and are welcome, because there’s a novelty to it. SA certainly doesn’t bring the bucks (like a Japan would to SR) but they bring eyes to it. But if they don’t perform (because they don’t have the money like the big clubs) - it’s easy come easy go… I think there is an element of strategic drafting going on in SA. Where the best players (assets) are sort of distributed amongst the major teams. It’s why we’re seeing Moodie at the Bulls for example and not at his homegrown Western Province. 20-30 years ago, it was all about playing for your province of birth. That has clearly changed in the modern era. Maybe Moodie couldn’t stay in the cape because at the time the Stormers were broke? Or had too many good players to fit him in? Kistchoff’s sabbatical to Ireland and back had financial benefits. Now they can afford him again (I would guess). What I am getting at is - I think SA Rugby needs to have a very strong strategy around how teams equitably share good youth players out of the youth structures. That is SA’s strong point - a good supply of good players out of our schools and varsities. It doesn’t need to be the spectacle we see out of the states, but a system where SA teams and SA rugby decide on where to draft youth, how to fund this and how to make it that it were possible for a team like the Cheetahs (for example) to end up with a team of young stars and win! This is the investment and thinking that needs to be happening at grassroots to sustain the monster meanwhile being created at the top.

63 Go to comments
J
Jon 5 hours ago
Why European rugby is in danger of death-by-monopoly

Wow, have to go but can’t leave without saying these thoughts. And carlos might jump in here, but going through the repercussions I had the thought that sole nation representatives would see this tournament as a huge boon. The prestige alone by provide a huge incentive for nations like Argentina to place a fully international club side into one of these tournaments (namely Super Rugby). I don’t know about the money side but if a team like the Jaguares was on the fence about returning I could see this entry as deciding the deal (at least for make up of that side with its eligibility criteria etc). Same goes for Fiji, and the Drua, if there can be found money to invest in bringing more internationals into the side. It’s great work from those involved in European rugby to sacrifice their finals, or more accurately, to open there finals upto 8 other world teams. It creates a great niche and can be used by other parties to add further improvements to the game. Huge change from the way things in the past have stalled. I did not even know that about the French game. Can we not then, for all the posters out there that don’t want to follow NZ and make the game more aerobic, now make a clear decision around with more injuries occur the more tired an athlete is? If France doesn’t have less injuries, then that puts paid to that complaint, and we just need to find out if it is actually more dangerous having ‘bigger’ athletes or not. How long have they had this rule?

63 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Ben Youngs: 'The job description of a 9 has changed. Gibson-Park and Dupont are leading the evolution' Ben Youngs: 'The job description of a 9 has changed. Gibson-Park and Dupont are leading the evolution'
Search