Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Steve Borthwick: 'The players handled it, the bench have been superb'

By Liam Heagney
Chandler Cunningham-South celebrates with Joe Marler (Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

England boss Steve Borthwick has paid tribute to his bench after the introduction of a half-dozen replacements helped them to complete a Guinness Six Nations comeback for the second Saturday in succession.

ADVERTISEMENT

Italy were beaten last week in Rome 27-24 after England’s subs helped to turn around a half-time deficit of 14-17.

Against Wales, the disadvantage was more considerable as they were down 5-14 at the break following an opening half where they were six-nil behind on the penalty count and had lost two players to yellow cards.

The introduction of sub props Dan Cole and Ellis Genge on 52 minutes was the first tactical move by Borthwick to use his bench to up the ante, changing the momentum in the scrum exchanges.

Chandler Cunningham-South, Danny Care, Theo Dan and Alex Coles all followed as England defiantly fought their way to a 16-14 win that left them two victories from two at the start of the championship for the first time since 2019.

Fixture
Six Nations
England
16 - 14
Full-time
Wales
All Stats and Data

“I always sensed from the players there was a confidence they would find a way to get the result,” insisted Borthwick in the aftermath.

“Secondly, I thought the squad had a big part to play. You saw big contributions from Dan Cole, Ellis Genge. Theo Dan and Chandler came on and had big impacts, as well as Danny Care.

ADVERTISEMENT

“When you have got that depth in those positions coming on and having that kind of impact, it means you can increase your intensity in the second half.

“If I go back to prior to the World Cup we identified England’s second-half performances had deteriorated since around 2018.

“We have put a big emphasis on second-half performances and what you have seen through that World Cup and examples last week and today is second-half performances more consistently improved.”

How has that change in bench impact come about? “There are a number of things:

“One is around the use of the bench; two is around the condition of the players; three is around what you do tactically and what the opposition do.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We have addressed it, the players handled it, the bench have been superb. I thought the bench during the World Cup was superb, and they have been in the first two rounds of this tournament.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 9 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Ireland wing brands Six Nations champs 'not that good an Irish side' Ex-Ireland wing brands Six Nations champs 'not that good'
Search