Northern | US

Rising stars named in Black Ferns XV team to play Springbok Women

WHANGAREI, NEW ZEALAND - JULY 05: Winnie Palamo of the Black Ferns XV during the match between New Zealand Black Ferns and New Zealand Black Ferns XV at Semenoff Stadium on July 05, 2025 in Whangarei, New Zealand. (Photo by Dave Rowland/Getty Images)
Comments
1 Comment

There’s some star power in the Black Ferns XV matchday 23 that will take on South Africa in Cape Town this weekend, with coach Willie Walker calling on eight capped internationals for the first of the historic two-game series.

ADVERTISEMENT

Neither the Black Ferns nor the Black Ferns XV have ever suited up for a match in South Africa, despite the iconic rivalry between the two rugby nations.

While Saturday’s contest promises physicality and fireworks, the build-up has seen the two teams connecting off the field. The Kiwis were welcomed to the training park on Thursday with an impromptu dance party, started by their opponents.

On the field, meanwhile, a number of rising stars will lock horns with the South Africans’ top squad, with young guns like Taufa Bason among a more experienced forward pack, while the backline has an average age of just 22.

Black Ferns XV team to play the Springbok Women 

  1. Marcelle Parkes
  2. Luka Connor
  3. Ashley Palu
  4. Sam Taylor
  5. Maama Vaipulu
  6. Holly Greenway (c)
  7. Taufa Bason
  8. Mia Anderson
  9. Tara Turner
  10. Hannah King
  11. Jaymie Kolose
  12. Hollyrae Mete-Renata
  13. Kelsey Teneti
  14. Winnie Palamo
  15. Mererangi Paul  

Reserves

16. Grace Leaso Gago
17. Cheyenne Tuli-Fale
18. Harono Te Iringa
19. Elinor-Plum King
20. Lucy Jenkins
21. Reese Anderson
22. Justine McGregor
23. Kaea Nepia

Springbok Women team to play the Black Ferns XV

  1. SANELISIWE CHARLIE
  2. MICKE GUNTER
  3. BABALWA LATSHA (C)
  4. VAINAH UBISI
  5. ANATHI QOLO
  6. FAITH TSHAUKE
  7. LERATO MAKUA
  8. ASEZA HELE
  9. TAYLA KINSEY
  10. LIBBIE JANSE VAN RENSBURG
  11. MACEALA SAMBOYA
  12. CHUMISA QAWE
  13. ELOISE WEBB
  14. JAKKIE CILLIERS
  15. NADINE ROOS

Reserves

ADVERTISEMENT

16. ROSELINE BOTES
17. YONELA NGXINGOLO
18. NOMBUYEKEZO MDLIKI
19. SINAZO MCATSHULWA
20. CATHA JACOBS
21. MARY ZULU
22. APHIWE NGWEVU
23. ZINTLE MPUPHA

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cnw 1 hour ago
Rugby's Greatest Rivalry - The stats showcase South Africa's lethal adaptability

I think the issue is much more simple than this. As you know I did not buy into the narrative that Razor was an incompetant coach. I saw real development in terms of clinical structured play. For me the players were struggling with the regimentation needed to play Black Crusader rugby and it imploded in Wellington. London however was an unfortunate confluence of injuries to our key play makers - Roigard and BB - and another brain explosion by Taylor. The failure also to develop a 6-2 bench compounded an energy deficit in the second half. DR threw out the Black Crusader regimentation in favour of his Chiefs, Glasgow and Steelers formula. It has sparked an attacking prowess we have not seen for years - but it has come at the expense of the type of structured % play that Razor was building and brought with it a high error rate. When faced with a well oiled machine like the Boks, who have been fine tuning their systems for several years, the inevitable lack of coherency is exposed. And if we reflect on the losses to Boks on this tour, we can pinpoint “moments” in the game where the Boks systems overwhelmed the ABs. So, one of the key issues with the GVF analysis is that it underestimates the signficance of context of the games and thus overestimates the real difference between the coaches and the players.

Ps to put some stats around this, I have analysed the performance efficiency of the Boks and the ABs for all the NC and GR games. This is based on an aggregate of point per pass / carry and tackle. The AB average is 4.7 and never got higher than 5.8 while the Boks averaged at 6.7 and maxed out at 8.2 in Baltimore. This supports a strong inference that the Boks systems are just inherently more efficient at this time while the ABs are still coming to grips with their new systems. It is not coincidental that the Boks lost with their lowest performance ratio for the tour at 6.4.



...

555 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close