Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Penaud to debut for much-changed France, Mapoe replaces Kriel for Boks

Damian Penaud in action for France’s under-20 side

Damian Penaud is set to make his international debut on Saturday after France coach Guy Noves rung the changes for the second Test with South Africa in Durban.

ADVERTISEMENT

A France side missing representatives from Top 14 finalists Clermont Auvergne and Toulon went down 37-14 to the Springboks in Pretoria last weekend.

Skipper Guilhem Guirado is among those to return in a starting XV showing eight alterations, while Clermont centre Penaud – the son of former France fly-half Alain Penaud – will wear the number 13 shirt.

Halves Baptiste Serin and Francois Trinh-Duc, full-back Scott Spedding and forwards Kevin Gourdon, Yoann Maestri and Rabah Slimani are the other players to have been brought in.

South Africa have predictably kept faith with the players who performed so admirably last weekend.

The only change to the Boks side is enforced, with Lionel Mapoe replacing Jesse Kriel, who took a blow to the head in the first Test.

Head coach Allister Coetzee said: “Jan Serfontein had a very good match at inside centre in Pretoria and we wanted a specialist at number 13 as replacement for Jesse, so Mapoe is a logical choice. It also means we’re preventing making two changes to the team.”

ADVERTISEMENT

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

286 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT