Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Pacific players boss: Why a Pasifika franchise could go to Australia instead of 'arrogant' New Zealand

(Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

The future of a Pasifika Super Rugby franchise could lie in Australia rather than New Zealand if recent comments from Pacific Rugby Players chief executive Aayden Clarke are anything to go by.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking to Stuff in the wake of last week’s announcement by New Zealand Rugby chairman Brent Impey that a Pasifika franchise won’t feature in Super Rugby Aotearoa 2021, Clarke labelled the Kiwi organisation as “arrogant” as he revealed inclusion in an Australian competition may be a more viable option.

Impey said that, of the Pasifika franchises that had expressed interest in joining Super Rugby Aotearoa next season, none had the on-field competitiveness and financial sustainability to thrive in the competition.

Video Spacer

Wallabies prop James Slipper says his side deserves to be underdogs

Video Spacer

Wallabies prop James Slipper says his side deserves to be underdogs

That has led Clarke to suggest that a move into the Australian rugby landscape could prove to be more fruitful than trying to persist with breaking into the New Zealand market.

“I do actually think there is merit in it being based out of Australia, rather than New Zealand,” he told Stuff.

“Australia have had a far more open-door policy, and a willingness with Pacific Island teams over the past few years compared to NZ Rugby.

“We’ve had the Fijian Drua play in the NRC [National Rugby Championship], we’ve had various options where Australia have been a little bit more kind, and without wanting to say it, a little bit less arrogant about it.

“It’s a genuine option.”

Clarke pointed to Sydney’s western suburbs as an ideal location to base a Pasifika franchise given the region’s strong Pacific community.

“The thing that New Zealand has done is, ‘It’s their competition, and they are running it’,” he said.

“It’s basically their decision, but I know that in Australia they are little but kinder towards a Pacific Islands team and western Sydney would be just as good a base, and probably better in my mind, than Auckland.”

Clarke’s sentiments echo that of Fijian Drua head coach Senirusi Seruvakula, who, in stark contrast to Impey, told RNZ that he believed a Pasifika side would have held their own in Super Rugby Aotearoa.

“We’ve got a lot of talent here in Fiji and they need a competition like Super Rugby and competition like the NRC [in Australia],” he said.

“That was a big opportunity for the local players to play in those kind of competitive competitions and to be included and into Super Rugby that’s a big bonus for them because of the talent we have here.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Seruvakula, who guided the Drua to the 2018 NRC title in just their second season in the Australian domestic competition, added that Fiji is significantly disadvantaged by not having a professional franchise.

COVID-19 forced the cancellation of the 2020 editions of the NRC and Global Rapid Rugby, which featured the Fijian Latui, and there is no confirmation of either competition returning in 2021.

Having a Fijian presence in whatever form Super Rugby takes next year would go some way to levelling the playing field, but Seruvakula conceded the financial constraints that come with that could prove challenging.

“To be honest it’s going to be hard for Fiji Rugby. To go through and get all those contracts Fiji Rugby needs backing from the government. They need backing from bigger sponsorships from companies to get all those across the board,” he told RNZ.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If it happens this is a first thing for Fiji Rugby: getting big contracts for big players to play for that Fijian team. It hasn’t happened for the Drua, they only get allowances, for Latui only allowances and for Flying Fijians they’re never contracted, they only get allowances – so to make this happen it’s a new thing for Fiji Rugby.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cw 6 hours ago
The coaching conundrum part one: Is there a crisis Down Under?

Thanks JW for clarifying your point and totally agree. The ABs are still trying to find their mojo” - that spark of power that binds and defines them. Man the Boks certainly found theirs in Wellington! But I think it cannot be far off for ABs - my comment about two coaches was a bit glib. The key point for me is that they need first a coach or coaches that can unlock that power and for me that starts at getting the set piece right and especially the scrum and second a coach that can simplify the game plans. I am fortified in this view by NBs comment that most of the ABs tries come from the scrum or lineout - this is the structured power game we have been seeing all year. But it cannot work while the scrum is backpeddling. That has to be fixed ASAP if Robertson is going to stick to this formula. I also think it is too late in the cycle to reverse course and revert to a game based on speed and continuity. The second is just as important - keep it simple! Complex movements that require 196 cm 144 kg props to run around like 95kg flankers is never going to work over a sustained period. The 2024 Blues showed what a powerful yet simple formula can do. The 2025 Blues, with Beauden at 10 tried to be more expansive / complicated - and struggled for most of the season.

I also think that the split bench needs to reflect the game they “want” to play not follow some rote formula. For example the ABs impact bench has the biggest front row in the World with two props 195cm / 140 kg plus. But that bulk cannot succeed without the right power based second row (7, 4, 5, 6). That bulk becomes a disadvantage if they don’t have a rock solid base behind them - as both Boks showed at Eden Park and the English in London. Fresh powerful legs need to come on with them - thats why we need a 6-2 bench. And teams with this split can have players focused only on 40 minutes max of super high intensity play. Hence Robertson needs to design his team to accord with these basic physics.



...

220 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT