Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

It’s official, the Wallabies are better than Ireland

Good news for the Aussies

The latest World Rugby rankings are out – and, if nothing else, have shown why releasing them at this time of the year is a somewhat futile exercise.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, they have provided good news if you’re an Australian rugby fan: despite suffering through a couple of horrible seasons by the Wallabies, your team has moved up to third. Irish fans will probably be scratching their heads at how the Aussies, even by virtue of a decimal place, have leaped ahead of them given their two latest respective test seasons.

Current World Rugby rankings:

  1. New Zealand — 95.52
  2. England — 90.14
  3. Australia — 85.59
  4. Ireland — 85.39
  5. South Africa — 85.03
  6. Scotland — 82.47
  7. Wales — 81.73
  8. France — 79.63
  9. Fiji — 79.48
  10. Argentina — 76.93

On the surface, it makes little sense – the Wallabies have been crushed by the All Blacks once this season and failed to put away, up until last weekend anyway, a weak Springbok team. They were also beaten at home by Scotland, a remarkable result given that the Scots were missing their best players due to the British & Irish Lions tour.

Ireland’s last season saw them famously beat the All Blacks and halt England’s march to a world test rugby record. Even though it doesn’t count towards the rankings, it’s worth remembering that they provided a glut of players to the Lions squad that went within a whisker of upsetting the All Blacks.

It seems that the only reason that the Wallabies have squeezed ahead of Ireland is simply because they’ve actually been playing over the last few months rather than actually being any good. Remember, this is the same Australian rugby set up that has just had to cut one of its teams from a Super Rugby competition in which they went winless against New Zealand sides in 2017.

The only somewhat legitimate reasoning as to why the Aussies are ahead would be to assess them on their performance at the last World Cup, where they made the final. But that completely contradicts England’s current position of second, after they famously bombed out of the tournament in the pool stage.

The All Blacks comfortably sit atop the standings, which comes as no surprise after yet another Rugby Championship victory. They’ve occupied the number one spot every year since they were established, dropping to a low of third following the 2003 World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

If anything useful can be read into the list, it’s Argentina’s staggering fall to 10th. This was their position the last time the rankings came out, and shows that a malaise has truly set in to the South American game. The Jaguares entry into Super Rugby seems to have been completely counterproductive, and the national side is about as fun to watch as a field of turnips growing. They now sit behind the likes of Fiji, Scotland and Wales – all sides Los Pumas should go in as comfortable favourites against, given their charge to a World Cup semi final only two seasons ago.

Of course, what this all shows is that releasing the rankings before the November tests means nothing. It doesn’t even do anything to promote interest in the upcoming fixtures, given that Ireland and the Wallabies aren’t even crossing paths to settle the score as to who should be higher on the ladder.

So if it’s not even serving to contrive any sort of intrigue, you’d have to ask why World Rugby bothered releasing this list at all.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

286 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT