Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Lots of positives for the Wallabies, but plenty of work-ons remain

Another refereeing blunder?

Looking at social media last night, you would have thought the All Blacks committed some atrocity in their 49-14 Third Test win over France in Dunedin.

Actually, it was referee John Lacey who committed the atrocity by running blocker on Baptiste Serin from a scrum move allowing Damian McKenzie a clear run to score under the posts.

It was another disgraceful refereeing episode in the French series with even the New Zealand commentators lamenting “not again”. But even taking out this try, it was a well-deserved win for the All Blacks. They were precise and clinical and they looked like the number one ranked team in the world.

A highlight for me was the All Blacks’ driving maul try from a lineout in the 22nd minute. The All Blacks faked a throw to the back and instead pitched a simple lob to the front man with no jump before driving over. They turned this super coach Under 15 play into a piece of brilliance.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Rain, hail or shine

Australian sports fans are a tough crowd.

If the Wallabies lose every week fans don’t show up or watch on TV. If it’s cold and wet they don’t show, and if the Wallabies win by 50 every week they don’t turn up either.

Conversely, All Blacks supporters just seem to love watching their team smashing the opposition week after week and turn up in big numbers. Reminds me of a mid-week Wallaby match I played in Ebbw Vale, Wales.

It was minus five degrees at least, the wind was cyclonic with driving sleet rain which was hitting you horizontally with the force of a body punch. As I signed a match program after the game for one of the thousands of Welsh supporters, I asked “why did you turn up, I would be home in front of the fire”, the reply I received was “well you know, nothing else to do around here”. Welcome to Wales.

Too close to call

What a great Test match in Sydney last night.

Both the Irish and Wallabies turned up to play and it came down to the final moments, with the Irish getting up 20-16 in front of a capacity crowd.

You could not pick a winner before the game, it was a 50/50 bet. The Wallabies were the better side in the first Test, the Irish the better team in the second.

At the end of this one, the Wallabies were simply not precise enough in their execution. The Irish had a bit of luck with some decisions and Sexton’s boot got them over the line.

The Wallaby scrum was superb again and really has come a long way, to be rock solid against two British and Irish Lions front rowers and put pressure on them was great work.

The Wallaby lineout is inaccurate and is under pressure a lot, this needs to be fixed. Mauling is really a forgotten art in Australia; players don’t learn it at school, club or provincial level then the Wallaby forwards coach has to teach a very complex skill in a matter of weeks.

Video Spacer

You saw the Irish driving maul like an arrowhead with just three players at the front with the pack slotted in behind slicing through a spread of five Wallaby forwards. You have to match this narrow concentration of power to stop a driving maul. Occasionally the Wallabies do get it right, but definitely the lineout and maul will be seen as areas to attack the Wallabies.

The tackle contest was more even this week, with the Wallabies able to halt the continuous quick recycle ball of the Irish.

Pocock again made some superb turnovers whereas last week he was the mystery man on the field, with the Irish able to cancel him out of the game.

Hard to pick a driving tackle last week or a double team on the Irish ball carrier but there were plenty last night and the Irish were denied the gain line on many occasions. Last week in Melbourne they strolled over the gain line with prop Tadhg Furlong a highlight with his big runs.

What to do with a very competent Wallaby backline in this modern game?

Opposition rush defence really cancels out Australia’s obsession with flat backline attack. I really need to have a chat with Bob Dwyer about this.

The Randwick inspired flat backline attack that has been the hallmark of Australian backline play for 30 years. The modern game in Australia has descended to tackle then use the width of the field from every play. Very few runners form depth and there is very little attack through the ruck or near it. I am surprised the Ireland Coach Joe Schmidt did not attack the centre of the Wallaby ruck, I am sure the All Blacks will.

Well done to the Irish, I bet they had a great night in Sydney last night “on the craic” with their supporters.

I think the Irish were deserved Lansdowne Cup winners and the series win tops off a great year for them with their Six Nations Grand Slam as well.

The Wallabies have a lot of positives to come out of the Test series but still have plenty left to work on. The Wallabies can go into the Rugby Championship with some confidence and on their day if every little thing goes right, they Wallabies may even give the All Blacks a run.

In other news:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 33 minutes ago
All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’

Sabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.

1 Go to comments
M
Mzilikazi 4 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Had hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”

11 Go to comments
S
Sam T 10 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

9 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle
Search