Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

James Haskell has revealed the poverty-line salary he was paid playing in New Zealand

By Online Editors
James Haskell of the Highlanders. (Photo by Teaukura Moetaua/Getty Images)

Recently retired England international James Haskell has opened up about all things rugby over his career with The Times, including what drove him to move to New Zealand.

ADVERTISEMENT

Haskell revealed the paltry sum he received to play Super Rugby, saying that it ‘cost me more to play for them’.

“I went to the Highlanders for NZ$20,000 a year. It cost me more to play for them but I went there for the love of the game,” he told The Times.

“I have been all around the world and enjoyed every day of it. You get one chance at life and I wanted to maximise it.”

Had that been the only income Haskell received whilst playing in New Zealand, it would put him below the country’s poverty line. Unicef determined the poverty line for New Zealand at $28,000 or less in household income in 2016.

Haskell played 12 times for the Highlanders over 2012-13 before joining Wasps where he made over 100 appearances before moving to Northampton Saints after the 2017-18 season.

He made 77 caps for England from 2007-19 and was a part of England’s 2011 and 2015 World Cups, of which both didn’t turn out to be satisfying.

“Both World Cups I was a part of turned out to be shambolic and disappointing. I would have liked to have had Eddie Jones coaching me through a World Cup. He would have made it something very different.

“My best games for England were under Eddie. He got the best out of me.

Haskell believes that this England squad has what it takes to win the World Cup but there will always be a part of him that wishes he was a part of it.

“I met Eddie and said I was going to retire. I wanted to thank him and I offered to help the squad if I can. I am more sad because I genuinely believe they can win the World Cup. If they do, 99 percent of me will be very happy. The other one percent will be, like, ‘f…’.”

He believes that for anyone to catch the back-to-back World Champions, a paradigm shift towards skill development is required from other nations instead of the obsession towards size. His only criticism of the game now is the lack of personalities in the game with everything so ‘boring’.

“For the game to evolve and to get to the level of New Zealand, people have to want to pick up a ball first and not weight.”

“Skills are fundamental. As are personalities. That is one criticism I would have of the game now: everything is so sanitised. You can’t say this, do that, offend that person, you must reshoot that photo because it had the wrong mobile phone in, or not ask that question. It is just all boring.

Gregor Townsend names his Scotland World Cup squad:

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Sam T 2 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

3 Go to comments
E
Ed the Duck 9 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Hey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂

5 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle
Search