Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Jacques Nienaber weighs in on strange kicking loophole shown in Premiership

Finn Russell of Bath Rugby kicks for the posts during the Gallagher Premiership Rugby match between Bath Rugby and Harlequins at Recreation Ground on December 23, 2023 in Bath, England. (Photo by Patrick Khachfe/Getty Images)

After a weekend of Gallagher Premiership action which contained possible the match of the season so far, Northampton Saints’ win over Exeter Chiefs, it is strange that one of the main talking points came from a minute period in Bath’s win over Gloucester where almost nothing happened.

ADVERTISEMENT

That is because there was a very particular, and much maligned, ‘kick tennis’ battle which saw each side set up ramparts of offside defenders, who were put onside once the catcher advanced five metres. This impasse has been much discussed since, with World Cup winning head coach Jacques Nienaber even giving his take.

For many, kick tennis is seen as the scourge of rugby, and while it must be noted that we seldom see a situation quite like the one at the Rec, Nienaber appears to be in the ‘anti kick tennis’ camp.

Video Spacer

Joe Simmonds on potential England selection

Video Spacer

Joe Simmonds on potential England selection

In a post on X, the current Leinster senior coach said that this exchange in the Premiership relates to one of the biggest fallacies in the game currently- that high ball in play time equates to exciting rugby. This was of course a period of over a minute where the ball was in play, but the South African pointed out that there was “nothing happening.”

He wrote: “And this is what people don’t understand…..this episode of rugby is more than 1 min ball in play with nothing happening except the ball flying through the air. People thinking high ball in play = entertaining rugby.”

Though situations like this one are rarely seen, there have been calls for law changes to ensure it does not happen again and to encourage more counter-attacking rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

The greatest irony is that the smattering of players strewn across the field actually led to an exciting passage of play after a charge down by Bath resulted in the ball falling into the hands of a Gloucester player on their own in the middle of the field, which launched an attack. Nevertheless, this was a passage of play that has not gone down well with much of the rugby community, including one of its leading coaches.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

9 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cw 6 hours ago
The coaching conundrum part one: Is there a crisis Down Under?

Thanks JW for clarifying your point and totally agree. The ABs are still trying to find their mojo” - that spark of power that binds and defines them. Man the Boks certainly found theirs in Wellington! But I think it cannot be far off for ABs - my comment about two coaches was a bit glib. The key point for me is that they need first a coach or coaches that can unlock that power and for me that starts at getting the set piece right and especially the scrum and second a coach that can simplify the game plans. I am fortified in this view by NBs comment that most of the ABs tries come from the scrum or lineout - this is the structured power game we have been seeing all year. But it cannot work while the scrum is backpeddling. That has to be fixed ASAP if Robertson is going to stick to this formula. I also think it is too late in the cycle to reverse course and revert to a game based on speed and continuity. The second is just as important - keep it simple! Complex movements that require 196 cm 144 kg props to run around like 95kg flankers is never going to work over a sustained period. The 2024 Blues showed what a powerful yet simple formula can do. The 2025 Blues, with Beauden at 10 tried to be more expansive / complicated - and struggled for most of the season.

I also think that the split bench needs to reflect the game they “want” to play not follow some rote formula. For example the ABs impact bench has the biggest front row in the World with two props 195cm / 140 kg plus. But that bulk cannot succeed without the right power based second row (7, 4, 5, 6). That bulk becomes a disadvantage if they don’t have a rock solid base behind them - as both Boks showed at Eden Park and the English in London. Fresh powerful legs need to come on with them - thats why we need a 6-2 bench. And teams with this split can have players focused only on 40 minutes max of super high intensity play. Hence Robertson needs to design his team to accord with these basic physics.



...

220 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT