Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Exclusion of Hutchinson and co is evidence of genuine Scottish strength in depth

By Josh Raisey
Rory Hutchinson hasn't made the Scotland RWC squad

Fans are claiming positives about the depth of Scottish rugby in the wake of Gregor Townsend announcing his 31-man squad for the World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

There were some noticeable exclusions from the squad, namely Rory Hutchinson and Huw Jones in the centres and Matt Fagerson and Magnus Bradbury in the back row, which have vexed some fans. 

Hutchinson’s omission has caused the most outrage on social media, despite the centre only earning three caps. He has already won over many Scotland fans, particularly after last season with Northampton, and his ability to play centre or fly-half makes him a popular figure. However, Pete Horne, who is equally versatile, has been picked ahead of him. 

Fans are also shocked that Jones has failed to make the squad after being a focal point in Townsend’s teams so far during his tenure as head coach. Yet, while there are those that are not happy with these decisions, other fans are seeing the other side of the coin – that this selection is a sign of the alleged current strength in depth in Scottish rugby.

Some fans are saying this is the strongest squad in years, believing that Townsend must have had a real selection dilemma. In the case of the back row, while there are some players that are unlucky to miss out, the question would be who to drop to accommodate them. 

There are always going to be certain players that different fans do not want in the squad, but on the whole, it is understandable why Townsend has opted for every player he picked. Horne may be a controversial call, but he is versatile, experienced and has been tested by Townsend in the past. 

With Sam Johnson, Duncan Taylor and Chris Harris being the other centres in the squad, two good players were always going to miss out and some fans are enjoying the depth in that position. This is what has been said: 

ADVERTISEMENT

Having only made his Scotland debut just over two weeks ago, the 23-year-old Hutchinson’s rise in popularity has been staggering. But his form for the Saints last season was sensational, making the shortlist for the Premiership discovery of the year award. 

Hutchinson will no doubt be a reserve should an injury arise to someone in Japan, but this is one of a few players fans think should be part of the squad. 

ADVERTISEMENT

WATCH: Warren Gatland on why he believes Wales can win the 2019 World Cup

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 5 hours ago
All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’

Sabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.

3 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle
Search