Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Players set for pay cuts of between 30-50% as Harrison responds to Rugby Australia AGM

Rugby Union Players' Association chief executive Justin Harrison.

Rugby Union Players’ Association (RUPA) chief executive Justin Harrison has suggested pay cuts taken by Rugby Australia CEO Raelene Castle and her executive, would be acceptable for members.

ADVERTISEMENT

Castle on Monday declared she would take a 50% pay cut and her executive would follow with a 30% wage reduction, as the code announced a provisional $9.4 million loss for 2019.

Harrison acknowledged the sacrifices made by Castle and her executive.

“As a playing group the members take an indication that pay cuts of between 30 and 50% are considered adequate to help the game through this crisis,” Harrison said.

“Our fear was deeper cuts might be needed and that the game was in a financial black hole.”

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

Forecasting “significant cuts” across the board, RA will meet RUPA on Tuesday to discuss what it will take to survive the next three months.

“I’ve committed to RUPA that we wouldn’t come to the table as a fait accompli and it be presented to them as a ‘here it is – take it or leave it’,” Castle said.

Harrison had previously accused RA of a lack of consultation in the process.

“They have expressed their frustration. I share their frustrations. I wish that we could get there quicker and I wish we could have all this nailed down,” Castle said.

ADVERTISEMENT

She said RA was reluctant to enter any formal discussions with RUPA before a clearer picture was painted at Monday’s annual general meeting.

“We’ll be able to expedite the conversations as opposed to starting last week with half of the information and not really knowing,” she said.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

Harrison said RUPA looked forward to a first opportunity for pragmatic and transparent discussions on the restructuring and survival of the game.

Legal bills associated with the Israel Folau saga stung RA before the hammer blow of COVID-19 shut down Super Rugby – and potentially Wallabies Tests later this year – leading to losses in match-day and broadcast revenue.

ADVERTISEMENT

Castle admits she can’t predict what professional rugby might look like next year, but is confident it will exist and that a “think tank” of the game’s key stakeholders will be assembled to assess their options.

Despite RA’s precarious overall position, Castle was confident it could stay afloat at least in the short term.

“Survival for the next three months is the most-important piece, then we can sit down as a sport,” she said.

“All I can say is we have enough cash with plans we’ve put in place to ensure we can be cash-positive at the end of that three-month period, so that’s a good start point.”

– AAP

Watch: The Breakdown is joined by some superstar guests.

Video Spacer

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 44 minutes ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

280 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT