Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Georgia flyhalf duo courted by French clubs

Luka Matkava of Georgia (C) runs with the ball during Rugby Europe Championship match between Georgia and Portugal at Stade Jean Bouin on March 17, 2024 in Paris, France. (Photo by Antonio Borga/Eurasia Sport Images/Getty Images)

Georgia stalwarts Luka Matkava and Tedo Abzhandadze are in the process of negotiating the next step os their careers next step, with the Pro D2 on the horizon for both fly-halves.

ADVERTISEMENT

After two seasons with Montauban, Tedo Abzhandadze is Aurillac’s number one priority to take over Antoine Aucagne’s place, as the Les Bleus U20 is moving to Perpignan. The 24-year-old has enjoyed little rugby in the current season, having largely been cast aside from either a starting or bench role at Montauban, and a change of environment might be the right decision for a player who is a vital cog in Cockerill’s Lelos.

As for the elusive Luka Matkava, after three spectacular seasons for the Georgian franchise the Black Lion – three-time Rugby Europe Super Cup champions – the 22-year-old is in contention to sign with a Pro D2 side.

George North’s future club, Provence, is one of the teams in pursuit of the flamboyant first five-eighth, but there’s still some uncertainty about what’s next for Matkava. Grenoble and Oyonnax are some of the suitors to sign Matkava before June.

The young 10 started in three out of four matches of the past Rugby World Cup, overtaking Abzhandadze to become the main fly-half in the setup, remaining the first choice in Richard Cockerill Georgia.

This would be Matkava’s first adventure abroad after successfully coming through the Georgian youth system.

With the announcements of Vasil Lobzhanidze moving to US Oyonnax and Irakli Aptsiauri joining Davit Niniashvili at Lyon OU, Georgia continues to bet heavily in the French pro competitions to give an extra push on their player’s progress.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

284 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT