Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Francois Louw cited for alleged eye-gouge

By Online Editors
Francois Louw has been cited for allegedly making contact with the eye area of Marco Fuser

Francois Louw has now been cited having allegedly made contact with the eyes of Marco Fuser, during Baths win over Treviso on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Louw will attend an independent disciplinary hearing in London on Wednesday, with the incident alleged to have happened in the 77th minute of Bath’s 23-0 victory.

Should he be found guilty the South African flanker will be facing a lengthy spell on the sidelines.

Any contact with the eye area of another player brings about a suspension of between 12 to 52 weeks.

Fuser has also been cited, for supposedly biting the Springbok flanker, also in the 77th minute at the recreation grounds.

The only other player cited from Champions Cup action this weekend is Leicester back-row Mike Williams for allegedly making contact with the face area of Racing 92 centre Henry Chavany.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 17 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won
Search