Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Former Irish international's claim: Billy Vunipola 'better than Kieran Read'

Billy Vunipola is set to be the only England player to start all four of their RWC warm-up games (Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

Blockbusting English loose forward Billy Vunipola is “better than Kieran Read” and is now the world’s best No. 8, according for a former Irish international.

ADVERTISEMENT

Neil Francis, the former second rower who played 36 times for Ireland between 1987 and 1996, made the verdict in a column for the Independent following England’s record 57-15 thrashing of the Irish in London over the weekend.

“It has been obvious for a number of seasons now that Billy Vunipola is the best number 8 in the world by a huge margin,” Francis wrote.

“On his day he is practically unplayable and if your tactical gambit is to try and rush him and chop tackle him before he gets up a head of steam your biggest problem will be just exactly where he pops up on the pitch.”

Francis reserved praise for the way in which England utilised the 1.88m, 130kg Vunipola, “even as an auxiliary scrumhalf at lineout time where he can throw pinpoint 30-metre passes to those outside him as he did in the Champions Cup back in May”, the 55-year-old said.

“His skill levels, his ball handling and his football intuition are even superior to those of Kieran Read.”

Francis made a point of highlighting Vunipola’s superiority over his Irish counterpart CJ Stander, who was “practically anonymous” at Twickenham.

“In economic terms, our economists class a recession as two consecutive quarters of negative growth in GDP. CJ Stander has not played a decent game of rugby in six quarters.

“A change has to be made here because he has become one-paced.”

Eddie Jones’ use of both Tom Curry and Sam Underhill in a dual-openside flanker role also earned praise from Francis, as the duo combined well to show plenty of promise throughout the contest.

“You just know that there is further room for improvement and England’s triumvirate at 6, 7 and 8 could lead them on to a World Cup victory,” Francis said.

By comparison, Ireland’s loose forwards ” seems to have no cohesion, dynamism or flair.”

Ireland have two matches against Wales over the next two weeks to rebound from the 42-point thumping before their World Cup campaign kicks off against Scotland in Yokohama on September 22.

As for England, they have a one-off clash against Italy at St James’ Park in Newcastle on September 7 remaining before their bid for a second world title gets underway against Tonga in Sapporo two weeks later.

ADVERTISEMENT

In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 21 minutes ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

I’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.

1 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Concerns over Scott Barrett as five key All Blacks sidelined Five key All Blacks sidelined
Search