Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Flanker snubs All Blacks for England opportunity - report

Hurricanes and Wellington loose forward Brad Shields has apparently spurned the chance for an All Black call up, according to The Telegraph.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s understood that All Black coach Steve Hansen wanted him in his squad to play France last weekend, given that Shields was in the UK having just finished his duties with the Barbarians. He would’ve provided cover for the injured Jerome Kaino, who was replaced in the starting XV by Vaea Fifita.

However, Shields was said to have rejected the offer – due possibly to his intention to sign with Wasps next season and potential eligibility for England. Shields automatically qualifies through his parents’ heritage and has been on the English radar for many years now.

It’s reported that Shields has had no guarantees from Eddie Jones about a place in England’s future plans, however conventional thinking would see him being groomed to take over Chris Robshaw’s number 6 jersey.

The 6’4″, 26-year-old Shields has long been considered unlucky not to make the All Blacks, however he’s had to contend with a very congested loose forward scene in New Zealand. As well as Kaino, he’s had to sit behind the rise of first Steven Luatua, then Elliott Dixon, Liam Squire and Fifita to the black jersey.

Shields was part of the 2011 NZ under-20’s team, alongside the likes of Beauden Barrett, Charles Pilatau, Sam Kane, Brodie Retallick and Codie Taylor. He has played 69 times for the Hurricanes and was a major factor in their maiden Super Rugby title last year.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

286 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT