Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Exeter Chiefs board to discuss potential rebrand this week

The Exeter Chiefs' controversial Native American mascot character. (Photo by Harry Trump/Getty Images)

Exeter Chiefs are set to discuss a potential rebrand of the club at a board meeting this week. The club have recently found themselves under increasing pressure to rethink their branding, which includes a Native American character dressed in a Chiefs kit.

ADVERTISEMENT

It is being reported that club bosses have taken note of the ongoing debate surrounding the use of the Native American character and will discuss their branding at a board meeting on Wednesday.

The views of sponsors and the tone of recent media coverage are likely to be taken into consideration.

Video Spacer

Win £5,000 for your local club thanks to Budgy Smuggler

Video Spacer

Win £5,000 for your local club thanks to Budgy Smuggler

Some Exeter supporters have been extremely vocal in their opposition to the current branding, with a petition calling for the club to re-brand gathering over 3,500 signatures.

The petition’s website outlines their issues with Exeter’s branding: “The stylised Chief on the club’s crest, the Big Chief mascot, the headdresses and tomahawks adorning the supporters, and the Tomahawk Chop chant are all examples of cultural appropriation of the Indigenous Peoples who were all but wiped out by white European settlers and who still suffer extreme examples of racial prejudice today across the world.”

The debate has split Exeter supporters, with a rival petition arguing: ‘The usage of the Native American in the Exeter Chiefs logo and brand is to honour and respect their cultural beliefs.”

That petition has gathering more than 2,000 signatures so far.

Exeter are not the only major sports team to find themselves in this situation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Washington’s NFL franchise recently confirmed that they would change their branding and drop their Redskins name and logo which had been in place for 87-years.

The franchise came under scrutiny in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement, which has highlighted ongoing issues surrounding race. Many had felt the Redskins name and logo was offensive to Native Americans.

Fellow NFL side the Kansas City Chiefs and baseball’s Cleveland Indians have also seen their team branding come into question, including fan protests outside games being played behind closed doors.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cw 1 hour ago
The coaching conundrum part one: Is there a crisis Down Under?

Thanks JW for clarifying your point and totally agree. The ABs are still trying to find their mojo” - that spark of power that binds and defines them. Man the Boks certainly found theirs in Wellington! But I think it cannot be far off for ABs - my comment about two coaches was a bit glib. The key point for me is that they need first a coach or coaches that can unlock that power and for me that starts at getting the set piece right and especially the scrum and second a coach that can simplify the game plans. I am fortified in this view by NBs comment that most of the ABs tries come from the scrum or lineout - this is the structured power game we have been seeing all year. But it cannot work while the scrum is backpeddling. That has to be fixed ASAP if Robertson is going to stick to this formula. I also think it is too late in the cycle to reverse course and revert to a game based on speed and continuity. The second is just as important - keep it simple! Complex movements that require 196 cm 144 kg props to run around like 95kg flankers is never going to work over a sustained period. The 2024 Blues showed what a powerful yet simple formula can do. The 2025 Blues, with Beauden at 10 tried to be more expansive / complicated - and struggled for most of the season.

I also think that the split bench needs to reflect the game they “want” to play not follow some rote formula. For example the ABs impact bench has the biggest front row in the World with two props 195cm / 140 kg plus. But that bulk cannot succeed without the right power based second row (7, 4, 5, 6). That bulk becomes a disadvantage if they don’t have a rock solid base behind them - as both Boks showed at Eden Park and the English in London. Fresh powerful legs need to come on with them - thats why we need a 6-2 bench. And teams with this split can have players focused only on 40 minutes max of super high intensity play. Hence Robertson needs to design his team to accord with these basic physics.



...

220 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT