England vs Australia: Four key match-ups
One of rugby’s oldest and most anticipated cross-hemisphere rivalries is set to be renewed this weekend, as Australia visit Twickenham to take on England for the 50th time.
The Wallabies currently boast 25 wins to England’s 23, but with the hosts enjoying a five-match win streak, as well as victories in nine of the last eleven encounters, the balance of power between the two sides has been shifting in England’s direction over the last eight years.
Both Eddie Jones and Michael Cheika have named their sides for Saturday’s contest and we have picked out some key battles that will be waged by the two sides and examine who has the advantage in those respective areas.
(*) RugbyPass Index scores
Ben Youngs (81) and Owen Farrell (90) vs Will Genia (85) and Matt Toomua (70)
The two half-back combinations are going to dictate where and how the game is played on Saturday and Youngs and Farrell have form on their side. Both players performed well against South Africa and New Zealand and if it were not for Farrell’s arrival from the bench at half time against Japan, who knows how that contest might have ended up?
As for Australia, they have tinkered slightly more on this tour, starting Genia and Bernard Foley against Wales, before moving Foley to inside centre against Italy in order to accommodate Toomua, and giving Jake Gordon the start at scrum-half. In neither match was the world set alight, but there was an increased control in the game against the Azzurri.
If there’s an advantage here, in terms of dictating where the game will be played and controlling the tempo of the contest, it would seem to be with England, although there is not much in it. Look for wing Joe Cokanasiga to help England win back contestable kicks and reward the accuracy of Youngs and Farrell.
Kyle Sinckler (66) and Maro Itoje (92) vs Sekope Kepu (72) and Izack Rodda (89)
These are four players who will be key at the scrum, lineout and in generating front foot-ball for their sides.
Sinckler and Itoje are two men England will lean on heavily to make up for the absences of Mako and Billy Vunipola, and they have been the hosts’ two most consistent carrying threats in the pack over the last three weeks. It’s a smaller sample size, but Rodda has been doing the same for Australia and his rise to prominence at the international level over the last 12 months has been extremely welcome for Cheika.
Rodda has been surging of late, as evidenced by his lofty RPI score, whilst Sinckler may be the strongest carrier of the four players. Itoje could well help England edge the lineout battle with his vertical ability and skill at adjusting in the air, whilst the scrum should be dictated by how Ben Moon and Scott Sio deal with the two tightheads, and it looks to be an even contest on paper.
If England have the edge in the lineout, Australia could well have it in overall carrying threats among their forwards, with Kepu, Tolu Latu, Adam Coleman and even David Pocock providing them with front-foot ball when they need it.
Elliot Daly (86) vs Israel Folau (85)
With Daly playing at outside centre week in, week out at club level and Folau one of the best full-backs in the game, this is an uphill battle for the Wasps man.
Daly’s positioning and dealing with contested aerial balls has been in the spotlight over the last few weeks, whilst these are responsibilities that Folau excels at, with his reading of the game from the back almost beyond reproach. If either team kicks loosely, both full-backs are threats to punish them, but in a more measured kicking game, Folau will have the advantage in dealing with the kicks where he is put under pressure by chasers.
Of course, Daly’s cannon of a left boot offers England a fillip in the territory battle and an ability to have a go at the posts from over 50m, but in the overall match-up, the advantage has to be with the Wallabies.
Sam Underhill (64) vs David Pocock (85) and Michael Hooper (86)
In the aftermath of England loss to New Zealand, Jeremy Guscott did an excellent analysis of Underhill’s impressive performance, but one point of contention in it was that Underhill would need to become more selective in his involvements in the game to become a true ‘game-changer’. In short, his eagerness for work defensively was holding him back from creating more turnovers.
Contrary to that, Underhill could thrive against Australia by continuing to be less selective, with the physicality he brings in the tackle, capable of driving ball-carriers back on the gain-line, a game-changing attribute in itself, especially against two operators on the ground as adept as Pocock and Hooper. If Underhill can drive ball-carriers backwards, it denies those two back rowers the opportunity to flood forward and deliver quick ball.
Likewise, when England are attacking, Underhill needs to be ruthless and efficient in his clearing of the two Australians, lest they manage to latch onto the ball and cause England ball-security issues. It’s a role both Chris Robshaw and James Haskell have performed well in recent encounters with Australia and now that burden falls on the shoulders of Underhill.
Expect another strong showing from the Bath flanker in this area, as well as his England teammates, who have looked savvier at the breakdown of late. That said, they will struggle to keep ‘Pooper’ quiet for 80 minutes and anytime support is slow to the ruck, the Wallabies will be a threat to steal and launch a counter-attack.
Watch: Pete Samu and Izack Rodda talk to the media ahead of the match with England on Saturday.
Comments on RugbyPass
You probably read that parling is going to coach the wallaby lineout but if not before now you have.
12 Go to commentsIf someone like Leo Cullen was in O’Gara’s place I don’t hear Boo-ing. It’s not just that La Rochelle has hurt Leinster and O’Gara is their Irish boss. It’s the needle that he brings and the pantomime activity before the game around pretending that Munster were supporting LaRochelle just because O’Gara is from Cork. That’s dividing Irish provinces just to get an advantage for his French Team. He can F*ck right off with that. BOOOOO! (but not while someone is lying injured)
1 Go to commentsDid the highlanders party too hard before the game? They were the pits.
1 Go to commentsWhat a player! Not long until he’s in the England side, surely?
1 Go to commentsHe seems to have the same aura as Marcus Smith - by which I mean he’s consistently judged as if he’s several years younger than he actually is. Mngomezulu has played 24 times for the Stormers. When Pollard was his age he had played 24 times for South Africa! He has more time to develop, but he has also had time to do some developing already, and he hasn’t demonstrated nearly as much talent in that time as one would expect. If he is a generational talent, then it must be a pretty poor generation.
4 Go to commentsThe greatest Springbok coach of all time is entirely on the money. Rassie and Jacques have given the south african public a great few years, but the success of the springbok selection policy will need to be judged in light of what comes next. The poor condition that the provincial system is currently in doesn’t bode well for the next few years of international rugby, and the insane 2026 schedule that the Boks have lined up could also really harm both provincial and international consistency.
16 Go to commentsJake White is a brilliant coach and a master in the press. This is another masterclass in media relations and PR but its also a very narrow view with arguments that dont always hold water. White wants his team to win, he wants the best players in SA and wants his team competitive. You however have to face up to the reality of a poor exchange rate and big clubs with big budgets. SA Rugby cant compete and unless it can find more money SA players will keep leaving regardless of Springbok eligibility and this happened in 2015 - 2017. Also rugby is not cricket. Cricket has 3 formats and T20 cricket is where the money is at. When it comes to club vs country the IPL is king but that wont happen because the international calendar does not clash with the club calendar in rugby. So the argument about rugby going down the same path as cricket is really a non-starter
16 Go to commentsNZ rugby seem not to have learnt anything from professional rugby. Super rugby was dying and SA left before they died with the competition. SA rugby did a u turn on their approach to international players playing overseas and such players are now selected for Bok teams. As much as each country would love to retain their players playing in local competitions, this is the way the world is evolving my friends. Move with it or stay 20 years behind the times. One more thing. NZ rugby hierarchy think they are the big cheese. Take a more humble approach guys. You do not seem to have your players best interests at heart.
3 Go to commentsBeaches? In Cardiff? Where?
1 Go to commentsHe is right , the Crusaders will be a threat. Scott Barrett, ( particularly), Fergus Burke , Codie Taylor, ( from sabbatical) etc due back soon for the Crusaders. There are others like Zach Gallagher too. People can right the Crusaders off, Top 8 , here we come !!
1 Go to commentsWe will always struggle for money to match the other sides but the least the WRU can do is invest properly in Welsh rugby. Too much has been squandered on vanity projects like the hotel and roof walk amongst others which will never see a massive return. Hanging the 4 pro sides out to dry over the last decade is now coming back to bite the WRU financially as well as on the pitch. You reap what you sow.
1 Go to commentsWhat do you get if you cross a doctor with a fish? A plastic sturgeon
14 Go to commentsWhat happened to feleti Kaitu’u? Hasnt played in a while right?
1 Go to commentsGregor I just can’t agree with you. You are trying to find something that just isn’t there. Jordie Barrett has signed until 2028. By the end of that he would have spent probably 11-12 years on Super Rugby and you say he can’t possibly have one season playing somewhere else. It is absurd. What about this scenario, the NZR play hard ball and he decides to leave and play overseas. How would that affect the competition. There seems to be an agenda by certain journalists to push certain agendas and don’t like it when it’s not to their liking. I fully support the NZR on this. Gregor needs to get a life.
3 Go to commentsHope he stays as believe he can do a great job.
1 Go to commentsMake what step up? Manie has a World Cup winner’s medal around his neck and changed the way the Springboks can play. He doesn’t have anything to prove to anyone. The win record of the Boks with him in the team is tremendous. Sacha can be wonderful and I hope he has a very succesful Bok career, but comparing him to Manie in terms of the next Bok flyhalf is very strange. Manie is the incumbent (not the next) and doing pretty incredibly.
4 Go to comments00 😍 U
1 Go to commentsSabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.
3 Go to commentsJake White talks more sense than anything I've read in the last 5 years. Hope someone's listening.
16 Go to commentsThe Springboks tried going down the road of only picking home-based players and it was an unmitigated disaster in 2016 and 2017. Picking overseas-based players has been one of the main reason the Boks have done so well since 2018, not only because of the quality Rassie could call on, but because of the knowledge and experience those players brought into camp from England, France and Japan. With some of the big names playing abroad it also gave younger players in SA the chance to break through at franchise level. Would we have seen the emergence of a Ruan Nortje if RG and Lood were still at the Bulls? Not so sure. I understand why Jake would want to block players leaving since his job depends on good results but it’s an approach that would take Bok rugby back to the bad old days and no South African wants to see that.
16 Go to comments