Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England were seduced by Samoa, admits Jones

England coach Eddie Jones

Head coach Eddie Jones felt England were “seduced” into a false sense of security in their 48-14 victory over Manu Samoa on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

England won for the 200th time at Twickenham, the most by any international side at a single venue, with Elliot Daly scoring twice from the left wing and George Ford impressing at 10.

However, the hosts were guilty of careless errors at times during what was a routine win, while Samoa’s brave defending stifled England’s undoubted attacking prowess during the early stages of the second half.

And Jones wants to see more consistency from England, while urging his side not to ease off the pressure in any match.

 

“It was a bit of a muddling performance from us,” the Australian told Sky Sports.

“We started well, maybe got a little bit seduced by the perceived easiness of the game. We stopped doing the small things well, we got pulled back and then finished the game off.

“We stopped doing the small things well enough. It cost us a few points out there.”

Jones did take plenty of positives, though, adding: “I thought Elliot Daly was superb on the left wing, George Ford controlled things well at 10, I thought Sam Simmonds did pretty well in his first start at eight.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We don’t have the consistency of doing the small things right but we’ve got two years to get that right.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

286 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT