England player ratings following defeat in Bloemfontein
England responded to their defeat in Joahnnesburg with a similarly frustrating performance in Bloemfontein, starting brightly and racing into a substantial early lead, only to let South Africa back into the game and lose their composure.
The Springboks recorded a well-deserved 23-12 win on the occasion of Tendai Mtawarira’s 100th cap and England were left once more in a position of having taken one step forward, only to then take two steps back.
We have rated all 23 players on a tough and testing outfit at the Free State Stadium.
- Elliot Daly – 6
An improved display from the one in Johannesburg. Offensively, Daly was regularly deployed at 15, joining the back line between Henry Slade and the wings, providing the speed and quick hands to put both wings away, including assisting on Jonny May’s first half try.
- Jonny May – 7
Showcased his speed to scorch passed the South African defence for a try, whilst also regularly looking for work off of his wing, including putting Mike Brown in for an early try on the left wing. Provided a good kick chase and competition for the ball on the right wing, too.
- Henry Slade – 5
Slade ran some hard lines which tested the South African defence but, just as in Johannesburg, he was caught narrow defensively on a couple of occasions, with none of the comfort England’s wings are used to with Jonathan Joseph. Good and quick hands, as ever.
- Owen Farrell – 5
A mixture of good and bad from the England captain. A try-saving tap tackle on Damian de Allende and an undefendable fizzing pass for May to put Brown in for a try were among the highlights, whilst a forward pass just metres from his own try line and twice opting to turn down three points for lineouts among the errors, in hindsight.
- Mike Brown – 7
Brown took his try well and looked more comfortable in defence than he had a week before, regularly moving into full-back as part of a pendulum with Daly. Showed good hands to keep alive the ball in midfield and set up May’s early score. Made two try-saving tackles at full-back.
- George Ford – 5
Did not quite have the same attacking impact in Bloemfontein that he did in Johannesburg, with the likes of Farrell, Daly and May popping up with the key passes to put players through holes or round the edge with overlaps. Had his defence tested and exposed on occasion by the powerful Springbok carriers, too.
- Ben Youngs – 6
Nearly gifted South Africa a try with a wide pass intercepted by de Allende but was otherwise solid, if not spectacular for England. Seemed to have his kicking game at altitude more finely-tuned than a week previous, with effective clearances and contestable box-kicks. Wasted a break in the second half.
- Mako Vunipola – 6
The loosehead had the better of Frans Malherbe in the scrum and put in some dominant tackles on the gain-line but was lucky not to see yellow for a needless shove of Pieter-Steph du Toit’s head on the floor.
- Jamie George – 7
A much cleaner performance from George, with the hooker connecting on 13 of his 14 throws and not giving away multiple penalties, as happened in Johannesburg. Still not offering the offensive dynamism we have seen from him many times before when called upon from the bench, but a solid performance nonetheless.
- Kyle Sinckler – 5
Struggled initially against Tendai Mtawarira but the contest evened out as the first half went on. He was busy defensively in the loose but couldn’t offer the same offensive impact he usually does from the bench. Steven Kitshoff forced a penalty try out of him before he left the field in the second half.
- Joe Launchbury – 5
Typically industrious on the fringes and at attacking breakdowns early on but failed to offer the ability in the loose that he is capable of as a ball-carrier. Faded out of the game in the second half, which was unsurprising given his recent injury, the game being at altitude and no second-row cover on the bench.
- Maro Itoje – 6
An improvement from the first Test, with Itoje a recipient of 10 of George’s 14 throws at the lineout, as well as making several dominant tackles on the gain-line. Held up Kitshoff to prevent a South African try in the second half but had a key knock-on when England were building pressure.
- Brad Shields – 7
An encouraging first start from Shields. Read South Africa well to grab an intercept and steal a lineout, whilst also showing good body control and balance over the ball at the breakdown.
- Tom Curry – 7
One of the few shining lights in the England pack, securing a couple of turnovers and putting pressure on South African kickers and first receivers. Saved a try, too, with an important turnover at the maul, working his way up the middle and getting his hands on the ball.
- Billy Vunipola – 5
Popped up with a couple of big carries but certainly not his best performance in an England jersey. Drifted out too wide in defence which allowed Duane Vermeulen to step back inside and score South Africa’s opening try, as well as a missed tackle on his opposite number later in the half. Left the game just prior to half-time with an injury.
Replacements
- Luke Cowan-Dickie – 6
Successful with his two lineout throws and added some punch as a carrier.
- Joe Marler – 6
A nice cut-back pass as a first receiver showed there’s more to his game than simply the set-piece.
- Harry Williams – 5
Struggled to live with Kitshoff at the scrum after replacing Sinckler and didn’t have much opportunity with ball in hand.
- Mark Wilson – 6
A late cameo with few opportunities to influence the game.
- Nathan Hughes – 5
Replaced Vunipola just before the half but was unable to put a positive stamp on the game. Saw yellow late on for a needless penalty playing the ball when he was off his feet and sat out the final 10 minutes of the game.
- Ben Spencer – n/a
Came on too late to have any real impact on the game.
- Danny Cipriani – 6
Probably arrived too late to have any real chance of changing the game but did show several nice touches, including a basketball over-the-top offload, some quick hands and a deft grubber kick. Impossible to compare to Ford’s 65-minute shift but did his chances of starting the third Test no harm at all.
- Denny Solomona – 6
Came on late and wasn’t able to influence the game.
Comments on RugbyPass
What a load of bollocks. The author has forgotten to mention the fact that the Crusaders have a huge injury toll with top world class players out. Not to mention the fact that they are obviously in a transition period. No this will not spark a slow death for NZ rugby, but it does mean there will be a new Super Rugby champion. Anyone who knows anything about NZ rugby knows that there is some serious talent here, it just isn’t all at the Crusaders.
1 Go to commentsI wouldn’t spend the time on Nawaqanitawase! No point in having him filling in a jersey when he’s committed to leave Union. Give the jersey to a young prospect who will be here in the future.
4 Go to commentsIt was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
5 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to commentsOf the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.
29 Go to commentsIrish Rugby CEO be texting Andy Farrell “Andy, i found our next Kiwi Irishman”
5 Go to commentsI certainly don’t miss drinking beers at 8am in the morning watching rugby games being played in NZ.
1 Go to commentsThis looks like a damage limitation exercise for Wales, keeping back some of their more effective players for the last 20/25 minutes to try and counter England’s fresh legs so the Red Roses don’t rack up a big score.
1 Go to commentsVery unlikely the Bulls will beat Leinster in Dublin. It would be different in Pretoria.
1 Go to commentsI think it is a dangerous path to go down to ban a player for the same period that a player they injured takes to recover. Players would be afraid to tackle anyone. I once tackled my best friend at school in a practice match and sprained his ankle. I paid for it by having to play fly-half instead of full-back for the rest of that season’s fixtures.
5 Go to commentsJust such a genuine good bloke…and probably the best all round player in his generation. Good guys do come first sometimes and he handled the W.Cup loss with great attitude.
2 Go to commentsWord in France is that he’s on the radar of a few Top14 clubs.
5 Go to commentsGet blocking Travis, this guy has styles and he’s gonna make a swift impact…!
1 Go to commentsWhat remorse? She claimed that her dangerous tackle wasn’t worthy of a red! She should be compensating the injured player for loss of earnings at the minimum. Her ban should include the recovery time of the injured player as well as the paltry 3 match ban.
5 Go to commentsArdie is a legend. Finished and klaar. Two things: “Yeah, yeah, I have had a few conversations with Razor just around feedback on my game and what I am doing well, what I need to improve on or work-ons. It’s kind of been minimal, mate, but it’s all that I need over here in terms of how to be better, how to get better and what I am doing well.” I hope he’s downplaying it - and that it’s not that “minimal”. The amount of communication and behind the scenes preparation the Bok coaches put into players - Rassie and co would be all over Ardie and being clear on what is expected of him. This stands out for me as something teams should really be looking at in terms of the boks success from a coaching point of view. And was surprised by the comment - “minimal”. In terms of the “debate” around Ireland and South Africa. Nice one Ardie. Indeed. There’s no debate.
2 Go to commentsThere’s a bit of depth there but realistically Australian players have a long way to go to now catch up. The game is moving on fast and Australia are falling behind. Australian sides still don’t priories the breakdown like they should, it’s a non-negotiable if you want to compete on the international stage. That goes for forwards and backs. The Australian team could have a back row that could make a difference but the problem is they don’t have a tight five that can do the business. Tupou is limited in defence, overweight and unfit and the locks are a long way from international standard. Frost is soft and Salakai-Loto is too small so that means they need a Valentini at 8 who has to do the hard graft so limits the effectiveness of the backrow. Schmidt really needs to get a hard working, tough tight 5 if he wants to get this team firing.
4 Go to commentsSorry Morgan you must have been the “go to for a quote” ex player this week. Its rnd 6 and there is plenty of time to cement a starting 15 and finishing 8 so I have no such concerns.
2 Go to comments