Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

CVC cash must go towards sustainability, not players' wages - Andy Goode

By Andy Goode
Dave Dennis, Geoff Parling and Kai Horstmann of Exeter Chiefs pose with the trophy in the changing room after the Aviva Premiership Final between Wasps and Exeter Chiefs at Twickenham Stadium. (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

The cash injection from the proposed sale of a minority stake in Premiership Rugby to private equity firm CVC must go towards making clubs sustainable and not into players’ pockets.

ADVERTISEMENT

As exclusively revealed by RugbyPass this week that Premiership clubs are likely to agree a deal to sell around a 25 per cent stake to private equity firm CVC for somewhere in the region of £240m and they are expected to be considering the offer at the next board meeting of owners, which takes place on 11 December.

It was only a couple of months ago that they were being offered a similar sum (around £275m) for 51%, so a good deal has been negotiated in a relatively short space of time and Mark McCafferty and co would appear to have done a good job.

The original offer never made any sense because at no point should the Premiership ever be subservient to a majority shareholder from the outside but to relinquish half the amount of equity for a similarly significant amount of money would seem to represent good business on the face of it.

Premiership set for new investment. (Photo by Harry Trump/Getty Images)

The success of any deal hinges on how the money is spent for me though. Some of it will undoubtedly go on clearing debts because 11 of the 12 Premiership clubs posted a loss in their latest financial accounts, with Exeter the only exception, but where the rest goes is key.

It should be used to improve the infrastructure of the clubs and be put towards planning for the long term. If it goes into the pockets of the players, then we’ll be back at this point with everyone losing money again before you know it.

ADVERTISEMENT

As an ex-player, I can tell you that players and agents will be looking at this news and thinking they should be getting paid more as a result and I’m all for players getting paid as much as possible but if all this money goes towards that, it will just bankrupt the game in the end.

Continue reading below…
You may also like: Scotty is back in the studio with Mils and a special guest Ali Williams.

Video Spacer

Players’ wages have gone through the roof over the last five years but they’ve reached the point now where if they go up much more, we are likely to see clubs go bust.

The danger is that it’s very similar to when the game turned professional in the late 1990’s and clubs spent beyond their means. The money ran out and clubs like Richmond and London Scottish ended up going into administration.

ADVERTISEMENT

I’m not saying that is going to happen with this injection of cash but it could do if financial mismanagement is allowed to occur and the warning is there from the not too distant past.

All Blacks captain Kieran Read. Photo / Getty Images

There are already rumours of Kieran Read now coming to the Premiership instead of the Top 14 on a salary of £1 million. I don’t think he’s worth that anyway but it’s the kind of short-sighted move that would represent a bad use of the money in my opinion.

If a club makes that investment in someone like Read, they won’t get that much of an increase in the number of fans coming through the gates of their stadium or watching them.

Some clubs will look at splashing the cash on a marquee player or two in order to hopefully boost their chances of achieving short-term success in the Premiership or Europe but that isn’t a legitimate business plan for the long term.

Clearly, all the clubs are going to get a windfall if this deal is ratified but for me there should be some sort of strategic plan behind how that money gets used.

I’m a big believer that you’ve got to balance the books and make clubs viable businesses in order for the product to grow and that just isn’t happening at the moment.

If you’re losing £5 million or £6 million per year as some clubs are, then you’re up the creek without a paddle if your benefactor decides they’re no longer interested so working towards a greater level of sustainability has to be the number one goal.

The whole reason for bringing CVC on board is to grow the product. Premiership Rugby claims it has experienced 80 per cent growth in the past five years and has stated that it wants to accelerate that growth even more.

There’s no way that growth has been in the form of bums on seats but it has grown commercially and television revenue has increased dramatically. That’s obviously an area CVC will be looking at closely with the BT Sport deal due to run until 2021.

They’ll also be able to have an impact on the sponsorship side of things because both Premiership Rugby and the Six Nations didn’t find it particularly easy when it came to securing a new title sponsor in the past year or so.

Businesses don’t just want to have their name associated with a competition any more, they want to see the value that’s coming back to them and that’s where CVC will come into its own.

Eddie Jones celebrates after win over Springboks at Twickenham. (Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

I’m very surprised that the RFU haven’t tried to get involved in these negotiations because if they were ever going to wrestle back control of the English game, this would have been the time.

If this deal goes ahead, they can have no complaints about access to players but a £40 million overspend on the East Stand at Twickenham and an overall operating loss of £31 million for 2017-18 probably didn’t put them in the ideal position to make a move.

If a private equity firm gets involved in something, it’s doing so to increase the value of it for itself. They will be looking to take money out but they’ll have a plan and leave no stone unturned in their quest to make the business more valuable. That can only be a good thing for Premiership Rugby.

If they’re paying somewhere in the region of £240 million for a quarter of Premiership Rugby, that means the business is being valued at almost a billion pounds already and I’m sure they’ll want to see that double at least while they’re involved.

Right now, clubs are making losses and if we carry on doing what we’re doing in English rugby, there has to be a question mark over whether these 12 Premiership clubs will still be around in 10 years’ time. A £240m investment will certainly help but the devil will be in the detail and certain strings need to be attached to ensure the deal is a success.

Watch: Jaybor Staunton visits Fukuoka which will host matches at the 2019 RWC

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

A
Adrian 49 minutes ago
Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?

Thanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause

7 Go to comments
T
Trevor 3 hours ago
Will forgotten Wallabies fit the Joe Schmidt model?

Thanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.

21 Go to comments
B
Bull Shark 7 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

Of the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.

29 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Why the All Blacks are serious about giving Sam Whitelock one last hurrah Why the All Blacks are serious about giving Sam Whitelock one last hurrah
Search