Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Cue the predictable outrage, but spare me the guilt trip - Scotty Stevenson

Brad Shields

Reports have surfaced today that Wellington and Hurricanes stalwart Brad Shields may be in line to play for England at the next World Cup after turning down the chance to join the All Blacks on tour. Cue the predictable outrage, but spare me the guilt trip.  

ADVERTISEMENT

If it is true that Brad Shields said ‘no thanks’ to a stopgap spot in the All Blacks on their Northern Tour in the hope he can secure a World Cup role with the England national side, then who in their right mind could blame him? Not me, that’s for sure.

Yes, we all know the story: Every kiwi boy dreams of wearing the black jersey and representing that famous team, so much so that they will do whatever it takes to get there. It has become such a part of the mythology of the national game that when stories like this one emerge, fans can hardly believe that any player would be so brazen (read: treasonous) as to eschew the opportunity*.

The problem with mythology is that it is too convenient. Yes, the All Blacks ambition remains a powerful retention tool for New Zealand rugby but at what point along the career spectrum do ambitions need to be tempered by reality? Shields has recently watched Hurricanes teammates Ardie Savea and Vaea Fifita make the step up ahead of him, but the list ‘what the hell do I have to do?’is much longer than that.

Since graduating from the New Zealand under-20 side, Shields – a versatile loose forward – has been passed over for All Blacks selection in favour of: Victor Vito, Sam Cane, Steven Luatua, Matt Todd, Luke Whitelock, Elliot Dixon and Liam Squire. That’s quite a list of preferred candidates to deal with before we get to the matter of Akira Ioane and Dillon Hunt, both of whom made their debuts against the French XV last week.

That list is not included to suggest Shields deserved a chance instead of any of those players. It is merely illustrative of the depth of New Zealand rugby, and a handy reference guide for those wondering why Shields may have started to think about another option to fulfill his international dreams. For six seasons he has not felt wanted.  Now someone other than the All Blacks selectors is allegedly telling him he is. That’s a powerful thing for a player to hear.

To be frank, regardless of who may have said what to Shields to convince him to put his faith in a different system, here’s the eternal caveat: in international rugby a promise means piss all, and any number of eventualities may prevent Shields from ever being selected. However, there is no shortage of one-test players in this world, all of who should be incredibly proud of their achievement, but none of who will ever have the chance to have a long-term international career. Such are rugby’s eligibility laws. And therein lies Shields’ quandary.

ADVERTISEMENT

Should he have accepted the invitation to join his national side, thus bringing to fruition that most famous of kiwi kids’ dreams? Or have the previous six years done enough to convince him that he’s not seriously in line for a more permanent All Blacks place? I’m picking it’s the latter, and as such he has done what very few people are brave enough to do: cash in the cow for a handful of magic beans.

Undersdtandably, given the renewed rivalry between England and New Zealand and between Eddie Jones and, well, every other coach in the world, there will be some consternation at this reported decision. That’s fine and dandy. Losing talent is something New Zealand does not like one bit.

Please, though, spare me the guilt trip. Brad Shields doesn’t deserve to be painted as a villain. He deserves to go search for his own glory. He may not have done enough to be a regular All Black, but he’s certainly done enough to earn our respect.

*cough. Brad Thorn.

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

286 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT