Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Cheika disrespected referee - Jones

England coach Eddie Jones

Eddie Jones has hit back at Michael Cheika’s claims that England will try to bully Australia by accusing his opposite number of disrespecting the referee for Saturday’s showdown at Twickenham.

ADVERTISEMENT

Cheika suggested the Six Nations champions would use underhand tactics in the Cook Cup showdown, targeting his half-backs with late tackles.

The Wallabies head coach said there would be “no point” in expressing his concerns to referee Ben O’Keeffe before the Test this weekend.

Jones was not impressed with Cheika’s pre-match comments, but does not expect O’Keeffe to take any notice of his compatriot.

“Obviously [the Wallabies] like the media more than the referee,” said the England head coach. “The referee is an intelligent guy and I’m sure he won’t be influenced by comments made in the press.

“I have coached over 100 Tests and every Test I have had a meeting with the referee and it is a sign of respect that you want to know what he wants from the game and what we want and it is a mutual exchange of information for the benefit of the game.”

Jones thinks Cheika ought to have thought about his words more carefully.

“It’s a nice term [bullying] to use at the moment.” he said. “You get up in the morning and there is a story on cyber bullying, a story on British gymnastics – it’s a common word to use.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We have had a good preparation and those comments by Australia are literally water off a duck’s back. I don’t know about all that fun and games. They want to play a lot of games at this stage.”

Australia suffered a blow on the eve of the game when lock Adam Coleman was ruled out with a thumb injury, the uncapped Blake Evener replacing him.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

284 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT