Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Cheika accuses England of deliberate late shots

England head coach Eddie Jones

Michael Cheika has started the war-of-words before Saturday’s test against England, claiming that in last year’s fixtures his halves pairing were targeted with late tackles.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They will try to bully us. Traditionally that’s the way the game has gone. They try to bully us at the scrum, at the lineout, and at the ruck – trying to get into us, niggle, trying to get into our half-back after he passes, the 10 after he passes.

“There is so much footage of that. They wait for us to crack. The fact they are unified behind that strategy means we must look them in the eye and take them on if we are going to be able to resist them.”

Cheika’s remarks followed the claim that Jones is “spoilt” by the resources available to him with England, made the Australia assistant coach Stephen Larkham.

“If you look at the resources they have over here, he’s probably a little bit spoilt from where he’s come from,” said Larkham. “There’s always going to be pressure when you’ve got pretty much unlimited resources around you.”

Michael Cheika and Eddie Jones are no strangers to playing mind games after the rivals were embroiled in a media storm during the three-match series last year in Australia, which England won 3-0.

Cheika named an unchanged team from Saturday’s 29-21 victory against Wales in Cardiff, leaving key playmaker Kurtley Beale at fullback who missed last year’s series.

ADVERTISEMENT

Analysis: Why the Wallabies need Beale at 12

Mouths from the South – Cheika vs Jones

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

286 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT