Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Brown could return for England, Underhill out

Mike Brown training with England

Mike Brown could be available for England’s Test against Samoa but the experienced fullback faces a challenge to regain his place if he is cleared for duty.

ADVERTISEMENT

Brown missed England’s 30-6 victory over Australia at Twickenham after suffering concussion in the opening match of the November internationals, a 21-8 win at Argentina’s expense.

According to Jones, the 32-year-old Harlequins back is on track to be involved on Saturday.

“Hopefully he’s going to train this afternoon so all things being equal he’s passed all of his stages and today is his next stage [of recovery],” the head coach said.

“We anticipate he’s going to be available for selection.”

In a separate interview with Sky Sports, Jones added: “Anthony Watson did superbly for us at 15 so we’ve got great competition for that spot.”

Flanker Sam Underhill, though, faces a period on the sidelines, also due to concussion. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“He won’t be available,” Jones said.

“We’ve taken a step where we just feel he needs a rest this week.”

Asked if it was a significant concussion, Jones added: “No, it’s just that, that was his second concussion this season so we’ve taken the view that we won’t risk him this week.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

286 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT