Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Brian Moore proposes England Women face age-grade male sides

Brian Moore has suggested the Red Roses could potentially train against age grade England men's sides.

Brian Moore has set social media alight by suggesting that the England Women’s team might consider playing age-grade men’s team in a ‘structured’ setting as preparation ahead of the Women’s Rugby World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

England hammered Scotland 57 – 5 in their opening game of the TikTok Women’s Six Nations, suggesting the perennial problem of a gulf in class between England and their opponents is yet to be bridged.

Moore is commenting at this year’s tournament after relinquishing the same role for the BBC’s broadcast of the men’s game.

Video Spacer

Chris Ashton | Rugby Roots

Video Spacer

Chris Ashton | Rugby Roots

As it stands, the majority of the Red Roses side are contracted under professional contracts, and there is a considerable divide between them and all but France in the current Women’s Six Nations competition.

Ireland, Scotland and Italy players – with a few exceptions – are either amateur or semi-professional, while Wales are a mixture of professional and amateur. France has been England’s closest rivals of late for the title, but it hasn’t stopped the Red Roses from winning 12 of the last 20 titles, including the last four tournaments.

To bridge the gap ahead of facing New Zealand’s Black Ferns at the Rugby World Cup, Moore suggests that Red Roses could play against England age-grade men’s teams, even potentially the U20s, provided it was ‘structured’.

“If the England women’s team cannot find the sort of physical and technical challenge that they need in ordinary fixtures against conventional opponents, they should look to see if it is possible to have structured training sessions and games against the England Under-18 or Under-20 male teams,” he wrote.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Purists might baulk at this sort of crossover and in an ideal world, where every Tier 1 union valued and invested in women’s rugby, this would not be necessary. Until then, they might have to be creative.”

“There is no reason, other than lack of will, for the Scottish, Irish and Italian Unions to fund a form of professional women’s game. It does not have to be the equal of that in England or New Zealand, but they can and must invest in this area.”

It’s an interesting concept, not least given the size difference between the England women’s team and their male age grade colleagues.

England’s Women’s heaviest player is Bryony Cleall, who stands 183cm tall and weighs in at 108kg. Cleall is an outlier, however, with most of England’s current forward pack weighing in between 85kg and 97kg.

ADVERTISEMENT

The England U20s on the other hand are effectively the same size and weight as a normal professional side – and in some cases even bigger. Many of the current England U20s forward pack top the scales at over 120kgs, while most of the backs are taller and heavier than the Red Roses’ forward pack.

Leaving size aside, the differences in athletic performance and body composition could call into question the safety of such an exercise – even in a structured setting as Moore suggests.

The former England hooker responded to criticism of the idea, saying he understood the ‘danger’. “I’m well aware of danger hence suggesting only structured training or games and then only if other unions refuse to fund their women’s pro game properly,” replied Moore to one skeptic.

At present many unions do not allow male and female players to play contact rugby against each other, in any context.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cw 6 hours ago
The coaching conundrum part one: Is there a crisis Down Under?

Thanks JW for clarifying your point and totally agree. The ABs are still trying to find their mojo” - that spark of power that binds and defines them. Man the Boks certainly found theirs in Wellington! But I think it cannot be far off for ABs - my comment about two coaches was a bit glib. The key point for me is that they need first a coach or coaches that can unlock that power and for me that starts at getting the set piece right and especially the scrum and second a coach that can simplify the game plans. I am fortified in this view by NBs comment that most of the ABs tries come from the scrum or lineout - this is the structured power game we have been seeing all year. But it cannot work while the scrum is backpeddling. That has to be fixed ASAP if Robertson is going to stick to this formula. I also think it is too late in the cycle to reverse course and revert to a game based on speed and continuity. The second is just as important - keep it simple! Complex movements that require 196 cm 144 kg props to run around like 95kg flankers is never going to work over a sustained period. The 2024 Blues showed what a powerful yet simple formula can do. The 2025 Blues, with Beauden at 10 tried to be more expansive / complicated - and struggled for most of the season.

I also think that the split bench needs to reflect the game they “want” to play not follow some rote formula. For example the ABs impact bench has the biggest front row in the World with two props 195cm / 140 kg plus. But that bulk cannot succeed without the right power based second row (7, 4, 5, 6). That bulk becomes a disadvantage if they don’t have a rock solid base behind them - as both Boks showed at Eden Park and the English in London. Fresh powerful legs need to come on with them - thats why we need a 6-2 bench. And teams with this split can have players focused only on 40 minutes max of super high intensity play. Hence Robertson needs to design his team to accord with these basic physics.



...

220 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT