Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

All Black domination 'boring' says ex coach

Sir Graham Henry

Two former international coaches have come out with diametrically opposed views to the All Blacks‘ last test victory – and one of them used to be in charge of the world champions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sir Graham Henry, quoted at an Emirates Rugby event in Dubai, said that rugby “doesn’t need one team that’s unbeatable, because that’s boring.”

“There’s no point having one team much better than everybody else because that doesn’t create interest. When you’re not coaching you want a competition and when you’re coaching, you don’t.” he said.

Henry also heaped praise on his former team, saying “What the All Blacks have done is been initiators in change, they’re inventive.Their ability to take advantage of opportunities is probably their X factor. And once they see the opportunity, they execute it.”

Meanwhile, Henry’s former arch rival Sir Clive Woodward has heaped praise on the All Blacks and Springboks’ attacking intent in his Daily Mail column.

Calling the 25-24 All Black win a ‘fantastic game’, Woodward lauded the “refusal of either side to kick the ball dead after the klaxon went for half-time. Both teams were ultra positive and wanted to play and entertain.”

Contrary to Henry’s assertions, Woodward claimed that the match “showcased the best the Rugby Championship has to offer. Contrary to what the critics say, this tournament is not moving in the wrong direction.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

286 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT