Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

"Yes" - Billy Vunipola claims he's prepared to take a pay cut

Billy Vunipola in action for Saracens

England and Saracens forward Billy Vunipola would be willing to take a pay cut if it meant he could play less rugby and avoid burning out.

ADVERTISEMENT

Vunipola sustained a serious cartilage injury in his right knee last November and missed the start of the 2017 Six Nations, while a shoulder problem ruled him out of representing the British and Irish Lions in New Zealand. Both issues required surgery.

The number eight suffered a further setback during Sarries’ 41-13 thumping of Sale Sharks on Saturday, with another operation on the same knee set to keep him out of action for the next four months.

Speaking before suffering that injury, Vunipola suggested the demands on players – England’s elite individuals are limited to 32 matches in a calendar year – are too high.

“I didn’t enjoy being on the surgery table twice in one year and that’s supposed to be deemed as normal,” he told the BBC’s Rugby Union Weekly podcast.

“Kids want to play rugby because it’s fun, but they also need to know that it’s tough, and it’s normal to have surgery at 25 because you’re so worn down.

“I’m not complaining, I just want people to understand that having surgery is not fun, and it’s not fun being injured.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It gets to a point when you are just done, and you can’t control when your knee goes out or your shoulder comes out.

“That was the weirdest feeling I’ve ever had in my life, not being able to control that and prevent it from happening.

“So, something probably needs to change, or the players will just burn out.

“Thirty-two games is a lot, but it’s doable. But do you want people to just do it, or do you want people to go out there and smash it?”

Asked if he would consider a reduction in pay if it meant he could play fewer matches, Vunipola replied: “Yes.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
The times are changing, and some Six Nations teams may be left behind

If you are building the same amount of rucks but kicking more is that a bad thing? Kicks are more constestable than ever, fans want to see a contest, is that a bad thing? kicks create broken field situations where counter attacks from be launched from or from which turnover ball can be exploited, attacks are more direct and swift rather than multiphase in nature, is that a bad thing? What is clear now is that a hybrid approach is needed to win matches. You can still build phases but you need to play in the right areas so you have to kick well. You also have to be prepared to play from turnover ball and transition quickly from the kick contest to attack or set your defence quickly if the aerial contest is lost. Rugby seems healthy to me. The rules at ruck time means the team in possession is favoured and its more possible than ever to play a multiphase game. At the same time kicking, set piece, kick chase and receipt seems to be more important than ever. Teams can win in so many ways with so many strategies. If anything rugby resembles footballs 4-4-2 era. Now football is all about 1 striker formations with gegenpress and transition play vs possession heavy teams, fewer shots, less direct play and crossing. Its boring and it plods along with moves starting from deep, passing goalkeepers and centre backs and less wing play. If we keep tinkering with the laws rugby will become a game with more defined styles and less variety, less ways to win effectively and less varied body types and skill sets.

286 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT