Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Ben Youngs questions the legality of Biggar's quick tap

Youngs has carried the burden for Jones throughout the coach's tenure. (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Ben Youngs insists England have received a valuable lesson in time for the World Cup that will not be allowed to happen again.

ADVERTISEMENT

Eddie Jones’ men were caught unaware at the Principality Stadium on Saturday as Wales’ quick-thinking exploited a moment of confusion to engineer a crucial try that secured a 13-6 victory.

Anthony Watson was in the process of leaving the field having been sin-binned for a deliberate knock-on at a time when Ben Youngs was waiting on the sideline to replace Willi Heinz, who had departed for an HIA.

Reduced to 13 men in the 32nd minute, they were ambushed by a quickly-taken penalty that saw Dan Biggar expertly launch twin kicks to each wing to enable George North to stroll over.

England were expecting referee Pascal Gauzere to wait for Watson to exit before restarting play, while the delay to Youngs’ arrival was also unsettling. But the veteran Test Lion recognises his own team were at fault as well.

Video Spacer

“Being down to 13 men is never ideal. Anthony came off and then the boys are in a huddle. Then Willi has come off and I’m waiting to be given the green light to go on,” Youngs said.

“Before I know it, Wales are off. It’s happened here and I dare say something like that will not happen again. It’s one of those things.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There’s nothing as players that you can do about that except take the one lesson which is don’t switch off when there’s a penalty.”

England can feel aggrieved, however, that on two occasions in the second half Gauzere pulled back Youngs when the Leicester Tiger attempted his own quickly-taken penalties.

“Dan Biggar is a tremendous kicker of the ball, looked at that opportunity and took it,” Youngs said.

“I tried to tap later on in the game and for whatever reason – I don’t know if it had been planted in his (Gauzere’s) head that he didn’t want anything like that to happen again – but I wasn’t allowed to go.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It is what it is. As long as it’s ironed out and doesn’t happen in the future I’m sure it will be fine.”

North’s superbly-executed try was the main talking point from an arm-wrestle of a second instalment of the rivals’ two tune-up Tests for this autumn’s World Cup.

Wales – potential quarter-final opponents in Japan – avenged their defeat at Twickenham six days earlier but little was learned by either team in a match that served the main purpose of giving players game time.

“We’re going into these internationals without much on the menu in terms of attack – strike-wise – because you don’t want to show much,” Youngs said.

“It tests us when you keep going back to the same moves and the same things, but that’s fine.

“We seem to have cracking encounters with Wales and they tend to be very physical and there’s no lack of that.

“If we both get to the quarter-finals, then I’m sure it’s a fixture that a lot of people would look forward to.”

England’s injury issues are gradually clearing up, headlined by prop Mako Vunipola’s return from a three-month hamstring injury against Ireland on Saturday.

The hamstring issue that forced wing Ruaridh McConnochie to withdraw on the morning of the game should clear-up within 10 days, while flankers Sam Underhill and Tom Curry could be back from their toe and shoulder complaints in time to face the Irish.

Back row Mark Wilson is also making good progress with his rib injury, while wing Jack Nowell and centre Henry Slade are looking at comebacks for Italy on September 7 as they deal with ankle and knee problems.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Singapore SVNS Day 1 - Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 12 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

28 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Hacjivah Dayimani exits SA on back of Springboks snub Hacjivah Dayimani exits SA following Springbok snub
Search