Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

What the Bastareaud incident tells us about rugby today

By Dan Johansson
What the Bastareaud incident tells us about rugby today

French centre Mathieu Bastareaud could be out of the Six Nations after being cited for audibly directing a homophobic slur towards Sebastian Negri during Toulon’s Champions Cup clash with Benetton Treviso. Whilst Bastareaud initially claimed provocation, he later took to Twitter to apologise for his actions which had attracted the ire of the ECPR.

ADVERTISEMENT

What is perhaps most interesting about this incident is what its fallout can tell us about the state of rugby union today. Andy Goode, hardly the first name that comes to mind when thinking of squeaky-clean PC enthusiasts, condemned Bastareaud on commentary, and later tweeted his disgust and called for a lengthy ban. The ECPR are reviewing the incident and considering the evidence against him, it is highly likely that Bastareaud will be out of action for at least the next few weeks. The citation process is notoriously inconsistent, but many have compared the utterance to Joe Marler’s “Gypsy Boy” outburst which saw the England prop miss two matches and pay a fine of £20,000 after being found guilty of using discriminatory language against Samson Lee.

That behaviour such as this is taken so seriously shows how the game reflects wider society. Racism, homophobia, sexism and other forms of discrimination have no place in the modern world and these changes are slowly starting to trickle in to areas like sports. The RFU handed out a two-year Twickenham ban to supporters found guilty of directing homophobic abuse towards Nigel Owens, and  David Pocock reported comments similar to Bastareaud’s to the officials during a clash between the Brumbies and Waratahs. It’s not necessarily that these incidents are becoming more frequent, but that we take them more seriously when they do.

That’s not to say that the new focus on stamping out discrimination isn’t without its critics. Whilst the vast majority of rugby supporters, commentators and players swiftly condemned Bastareaud’s comments, there remains a vocal minority who have complained that this represents the game “going soft”. To them, sledging or abusing of opponents is all part of the game and the outcry is just another example of political correctness gone mad.

These views unfortunately miss the point. Bastareaud is not facing criticism because he insulted his opponent, it’s because he called him a “f***ing f****t”. Those who claim that this isn’t homophobic are failing to acknowledge the interactional relationship between language and society. Several commenters online have suggested that unless Negri is gay, then there’s nothing inherently discriminatory about the language but this view ignores the wider implications of linguistic choices. Negri’s sexual identity is irrelevant in this context – to use language which is imbued with discriminatory connotations against a particular community as an insult indicates that membership of that group is in itself A Bad Thing, and that one should feel insulted to be compared to it. LGBT+ rugby fans watching the match (and there will have been many) will have heard one of the most notable rugby players in Europe using their identity as an insult.

It’s perhaps important to temper these discussions with some clarification. Using this slur does not in and of itself mean that Bastareaud is homophobic, though it certainly does not help dispel that perception. Even just statistically speaking, he will have friends, family members, team mates and opponents who do not identify as heterosexual, and he may hold no animosity towards them. But using this language at best comes from a place of ignorance. It’s 2018, if you’re using someone’s sexual orientation as an insult, you’re an arse.

Language evolves and what was once considered acceptable will shift over time. Plenty of us will have used language in the past that, on reflection, speaks to a position of ignorance. Hopefully, we learn from these mistakes and can move forward. There are certain lines that should not be crossed and whilst it may sometimes seem like a challenge to keep up with the movement of these lines, it is a challenge worth trying to meet so that rugby can become a more inclusive environment for everyone.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Sam T 4 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

4 Go to comments
E
Ed the Duck 11 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Hey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂

5 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-All Black Aaron Cruden emerges as a candidate for Ireland move Ex-All Black Aaron Cruden emerges as a candidate for Ireland move
Search