Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Argentina pull out of World Cup race and pledge support behind opposition

By Online Editors
(Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

Argentina have pulled out of the race to host the 2027 World Cup and have instead thrown their support behind the only other tier-one nation currently believed to be competing for rugby’s showpiece tournament.

ADVERTISEMENT

The destinations for the 2027 and 2031 World Cup won’t be awarded until next year but Argentina have made the decision to abandon their chances of bringing the competition to the Americas for the first time in favour of giving Australia a greater shot at winning hosting rights.

Rugby Australia’s financial situation is shaky, to say the least. CEO Raelene Castle revealed earlier this month that the Australian union could shed $120 million of revenue if matches are cancelled for the remainder of the year which, coupled with RA’s $9.4 operating deficit for 2019 paints a bleak outline of the nation’s predicament.

Video Spacer

World Rugby won’t bail out SANZAAR despite facing $790m financial deficit.

Video Spacer

World Rugby won’t bail out SANZAAR despite facing $790m financial deficit.

A World Cup’s worth of revenues would a be a huge boon for Rugby Australia – even if they’d have to wait almost 8 years before the competition arrived on their doorstep.

The Unión Argentina de Rugby have decided that lodging a bid for the 2027 Cup would make little sense, given the bid of their SANZAAR brother.

“We discussed it with Australia and we thought it was not good for us to compete against our partner,” World Rugby vice-chairman Agustine Pichot revealed to The Daily Telegraph.

“So we decided to just let Australia run because they also had a stronger project.”

Australia last hosted the Rugby World Cup in 2003 when Jonny Wilkinson kicked a famous drop goal to help England snare the title from the hosts’ grasps in the grand final.

ADVERTISEMENT

That tournament generated $44 million of profit for the nation which would be a huge windfall for Australia on its own but if recent competitions are to go by, Australia could be set to make considerably more than that figure in 2027.

The 2015 competition hosted by England netted $4.7 billion revenue while Japan produced $6.4 billion last year.

Of course, for any such tournament to go ahead in Australia, RA will need to keep the game afloat in the meantime – which is easier said than done.

Pichot confirmed earlier this week that the SANZAAR nations would not receive any bailing out if things take a further turn for the worse this year due to coronavirus and Australia are quite possibly in the worst situation of any of the member nations.

ADVERTISEMENT

Still, a World Cup would give fans in Australia something to similar about – and something to invigorate the game at the lower levels. With the Northern Hemisphere hosting the latest three scheduled tournaments (England 2015, Japan 2019, France 2023), there’s certainly a very good argument for taking the competition south.

“From a rugby point of view but also from a general population point of view, it’s projects like this which provide a bit of light at the end of a dark tunnel,” RA’s RWC bid manager Anthony French said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 6 hours ago
All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’

Sabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.

3 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Glimmers of positivity but Welsh rugby not moving anywhere fast Glimmers of positivity but Welsh rugby not moving anywhere fast
Search